New 49'ERS, Inc. v. Karuk Tribe of Cal.

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationNew 49'ERS, Inc. v. Karuk Tribe of Cal., 133 S.Ct. 1579, 185 L.Ed.2d 575, 568 U.S. 1228 (2013)
Decision Date18 March 2013
Docket NumberNo. 12–289.,12–289.
Parties The NEW 49'ERS, INC., et al., petitioners, v. KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Ellis v. Housenger
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • May 8, 2017
    ...or critical habitat." Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service, 681 F.3d 1006, 1027 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1228, 133 S.Ct. 1579, 185 L.Ed.2d 575 (2013).Here, the EPA concedes it has not consulted either said agency nor made a "no effect" determination with respect to the......
  • Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • August 13, 2014
    ...*9–10 (citing Karuk Tribe of Cal. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 681 F.3d 1006 (9th Cir.2012) (en banc) cert. denied, ––– U.S. ––––, 133 S.Ct. 1579, 185 L.Ed.2d 575 (2013) (“Karuk Tribe ”)). In Karuk Tribe, the Ninth Circuit set forth a two-pronged test to determine whether a federal agency must con......
  • Conservation Cong. v. U.S. Forest Serv.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of California
    • September 6, 2013
    ... ... U.S. Forest Service , 2012 WL 2339765 (E.D. Cal. 2012) (Karlton, J.) (emphasis added), aff'd , 720 F.3d ... Karuk Tribe of California v. U.S. Forest Service , 681 F.3d 1006, ... ...
  • Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • November 25, 2013
    ...control. See Karuk Tribe of California v. U.S. Forest Serv., 681 F.3d 1006, 1012 (9th Cir. 2012) cert. denied, 133 S. Ct. 1579, 185 L. Ed. 2d 575 (U.S. 2013). The Court held that, with respect to each affirmative action that triggers the duty to consult, Plaintiffs must also allege facts es......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles