New Amsterdam Casualty Company v. Murray

Decision Date26 March 1957
Docket NumberNo. 12917.,12917.
Citation242 F.2d 549
PartiesNEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Elizabeth W. MURRAY, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Gladney Harville, Lexington, Ky. (Stoll, Keenon & Park, Lexington, Ky., Boyd F. Taylor, Jr., and William A. Hamm, London, Ky., Kiser, Vicars & Kiser, Wise, Va., on the brief), for appellant.

James S. Greene, Jr., Harlan, Ky. (James Sampson, Harlan, Ky., on the brief), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee, a woman passenger in a motor vehicle, sustained personal injuries as a result of a collision with another motor vehicle, in the State of Kentucky. The insurer of the latter vehicle brought suit in Virginia in a court of competent jurisdiction for cancellation of a policy of insurance on the ground that the insured had procured its issuance by fraudulent representations. The policy of insurance was written in Virginia. The insurance company was authorized to do business in both Virginia and Kentucky.

Service of summons was had upon the insured, and, on his failure to appear, a default judgment was entered in favor of the insurance company, cancelling the policy as of a date prior to the accident. Appellee, who was the passenger injured in the collision, was not a party to the suit for cancellation and had no notice or knowledge of the suit. Later, the injured passenger brought suit in Kentucky against the son of the insured, who was covered by the insurance, and who was driving the motor vehicle with the permission of the insured at the time of the accident; and upon trial, was awarded a judgment in the amount of $25,000. She later brought suit against the insurance company, asking a judgment in the above amount, together with interest and costs expended in the personal injury suit, and the district court, upon verdict of a jury, entered a judgment in her favor against the insurance company.

There is no question but that the insurance company would be liable to appellee, if no questions of fraudulent procurement of the policy, or invalid service of summons were in the case.

However, appellant insurance company submits that the judgment in the State of Virginia, cancelling the policy for having been procured by fraudulent representations, is binding on the appellee, regardless of the fact that she was not a party to the suit, and had no notice thereof.

The district court held that, as to the insurance company, appellee's rights arose upon the happening of the accident, and could not thereafter be abridged by the judgment to which she was not a party...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Sobina v. Busby
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • 18 Marzo 1965
    ...and were not cut off in a later decree entered in proceedings to which the plaintiffs were not parties. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Murray, 242 F.2d 549 (6th Cir., 1957); Spann v. Commercial Standard Ins. Co., 82 F.2d 593 (8th Cir., 1936); Dransfield v. Citizens Casualty Co., 5 N.J. 190, ......
  • Talbott Big Foot, Inc., Matter of, 88-3612
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 2 Noviembre 1989
    ...Ford, 833 F.2d at 1175; Freeman v. Lester Coggins Trucking, Inc., 771 F.2d 860, 864 (5th Cir.1985). See also New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Murray, 242 F.2d 549, 550 (6th Cir.1957); Shapiro v. Republic Indemnity Co. of America, 52 Cal.2d 437, 341 P.2d 289, 291 (1959); Collard v. Universal Au......
  • Mayflower Insurance Exchange v. Gilmont
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 21 Junio 1960
    ...of the insurer against the insured is not binding upon injured third parties who were not parties thereto. E. G., New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Murray, 6 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 549; Dransfield v. Citizens Casualty Co., 1950, 5 N.J. 190, 74 A.2d 304, 18 A.L.R.2d 887. 2 See O.R.S. 741.150(3) (n......
  • Gibbons & Reed Co. v. Standard Accident Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Utah
    • 31 Octubre 1960
    ...50 F.Supp. 438. 3 Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co., 10 Cir., 1949, 173 F.2d 844; New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Murray, 6 Cir., 1957, 242 F.2d 549; Atex Mfg. Co. v. Lloyd's of London, D.C.Ark. 1955, 139 F.Supp. 314; Tomerlin v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co., D.C.Ill. 19......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT