New England Foundation Co. v. Rugo Const. Co., 1037.

Decision Date23 April 1945
Docket NumberNo. 1037.,1037.
Citation1945 AMC 513,60 F. Supp. 143
PartiesNEW ENGLAND FOUNDATION CO., Inc., v. RUGO CONST. CO., Inc.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Massachusetts

Bingham, Dana & Gould and Albert T. Gould, all of Boston, Mass., for libellant.

Charles A. McCarron and Thomas H. Walsh, both of Boston, Mass., for respondent.

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This is a libel in admiralty by the New England Foundation Company, Inc., owner of Lighter No. 1, against the Rugo Construction Company to recover for damage sustained by the lighter while under charter to the respondent.

Findings of Fact

On July 5, 1941, the respondent, Rugo Construction Company, entered into a contract with the Navy Department, Bureau of Yards and Docks, to perform certain construction work at the Naval Air Station, Squantum, Massachusetts.

On August 28, 1941, the libellant demise chartered Lighter No. 1 to the respondent on the following terms: "One derrick lighter, $800 a month rental, no fuel, transportation or personnel". In these negotiations the Rugo Construction Company acted through William H. Curley, a civilian employee of the Navy Department.

On November 5, 1941, the lighter was again demise chartered to the respondent. The terms of this contract of hire were the same terms as those which had governed the August charter except that the hiring was to be by the month with no "split months". The lighter was delivered to the respondent on November 5, 1941, by turning her over to a tug of the Hall Tug & Barge Corporation which had been dispatched on behalf of the respondent to take the lighter to Squantum. The lighter was then used by the respondent in pulling piles at Squantum.

On December 3, 1941, Curley ordered the lighter tied up outside of another boat in the crash boat slip. I find that this was a clear berth. On that same evening the lighter was sunk and on the bottom at the berth in Squantum.

I find that on November 5, 1941, when Lighter No. 1 was chartered to the respondent, she was seaworthy, in good condition, and properly fitted for the work in which she was expected to engage. There is some evidence that the hull was "leaking slightly" on September 2, 1941, but this did not make her unseaworthy. The lighter was used almost continuously by the respondent until the day she sank. Furthermore, the respondent re-chartered the lighter in November, 1941, without making any representations of unsound condition to the libellant. Although a showing of continuous use by the charterer does not establish seaworthiness at the time of the charter, it does serve to buttress other testimony on this issue. I further find that when Lighter No. 1 was sunk she was in the possession and control of the respondent during the charter period. No evidence of negligence on the part of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • McDonough Construction Co. v. HB Fowler & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • March 5, 1968
    ...and interest at the rate of 5% per annum from February 1, 1966, plus $750.00 for attorney's fees. 1 New England Foundation Co., Inc. v. Rugo Const. Co., D.C.Mass., 1945, 60 F. Supp. 143; Alpine Forwarding Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 1932, 60 F. 2d 734; O'Brien Bros. Inc. v. City of ......
  • Banks v. Chas. Kurz Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Pennsylvania
    • November 29, 1946
    ...under a demise and redelivery in bad condition; Howard v. Dobbins-Trinity Coal Co., 2 Cir., 111 F.2d 571; New England Co. v. Rugo Construction Co., D.C. Mass., 60 F.Supp. 143; see discussion in Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transp. Co., 3 The weather report shows cloudy weather with li......
  • Stoufflet v. Cenac Towing Company, Admiralty—No. 4682.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • November 25, 1964
    ...go forward with exculpatory evidence of sufficient weight to overcome the presumption of negligence. New England Foundation Co. v. Rugo Construction Co., 60 F.Supp. 143 (D.C.Mass. 1945); Tomkins Cove Stone Co. v. Bleakley Transportation Co., Inc., 40 F.2d 249 (CA3 6. Since respondent has in......
  • American Cement Corp. v. Healy Tibbitts Construction Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • February 7, 1966
    ...of the voyage. This amount of leakage, particularly in a wooden vessel, does not render it unseaworthy. New England Foundation Co. v. Rugo Const. Co., 60 F.Supp. 143 (D.Mass.1945), aff'd 172 F.2d 964 (1st Cir. 1949). After the casualty, there were two feet of water in the bilge. Presence of......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT