New Hampshire Land Co. v. Tilton

• Decision Date: 03 February 1887
• Parties: NEW HAMPSHIRE LAND CO. v. TILTON and others.
• Court: U.S. District Court — District of New Hampshire

29 F. 764

NEW HAMPSHIRE LAND CO. v. TILTON and others.

United States Circuit Court, D. New Hampshire.

February 3, 1887

Chase &amp Streeter, for plaintiff.

Aldrich & Remich and Bingham & Mitchell, for defendants.

COLT J.

The defendants ask to have allowed in their taxed costs against the plaintiff the expense of certain surveys and plans made and used by them in the preparation and trial of the case. The plaintiff, by its writ of entry filed at the May term 1882, demanded possession of a large tract of land, about 50,000 acres, situated in Grafton county, New Hampshire. The declaration described the land claimed. The defendants in their plea filed August 24, 1882, disclaimed all lands in the plaintiff's declaration described, except certain lots. At the next term of court the plaintiff moved that defendants' plea be rejected on the grounds of uncertainty and insufficiency. Upon this motion the plaintiff claimed that defendants' plea did not tender an issue upon which a trial of a real action could be had, because the lots claimed by defendants had never been surveyed and marked upon the ground, and that, therefore, the lines of said lots could not be ascertained from the description in the plea. The defendants admitted that the lots claimed by them had never been actually surveyed and marked upon the ground. Upon hearing the parties, the presiding judge, against the defendants' objection, ordered that part of the plea describing the lots claimed by defendants rejected, and that the defendants furnish a plea describing the lines of the lots claimed by them by fixed, definite, and visible monuments upon the ground. To comply with this order, the defendants were obliged to make surveys, and, after making them, they filed an amendment to their plea, setting out by definite boundaries these lots. The surveys were made to perfect the defendants' pleading, and to furnish a plea in accordance with the order of the court.

Under these circumstances, I do not see how the defendants can recover for these expenses as a part of their taxable costs. They were ordered by the court to make their plea more certain. In order to enable them to file a proper plea, it became necessary for them to make the surveys. This was an expense incidental and necessary to their defense. It was not an expense incurred under any rule or practice of this court or for the benefit of both parties. By section 914, Rev. St the practice,...