Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United States | 1-929-605-4013

New Hampshire v. Kuchman

Document Justia Case Summary Cited authorities 34 Cited in 13 Precedent Map Related
Docket Number2014-0631
Decision Date19 April 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • MacDonald v. Jacobs
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • January 15, 2019
    ...discretion, we will affirm a trial court's decision on whether a mistrial or other remedial action was necessary. State v. Kuchman, 168 N.H. 779, 787, 138 A.3d 1264 (2016) ; see State v. Lambert, 147 N.H. 295, 296, 787 A.2d 175 (2001) (explaining that to show that the trial court's decision......
  • State v. Milton
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • November 17, 2016
    ...New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 403 operates as "an exclusionary rule that cuts across the rules of evidence." State v. Kuchman, 168 N.H. 779, 789, 138 A.3d 1264 (2016) (quotation omitted). It states, in relevant part, that "[a]lthough relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative valu......
  • State v. Milton
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • November 17, 2016
    ...402. However, New Hampshire Rule of Evidence 403 operates as "an exclusionary rule that cuts across the rules of evidence." State v. Kuchman, 168 N.H. 779, 789 (2016) (quotation omitted). It states, in relevant part, that "[a]lthough relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT