New Jersey State Bar Ass'n v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor Boards

Decision Date28 October 1983
Citation94 N.J. 449,467 A.2d 577
PartiesNEW JERSEY STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, A Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. NEW JERSEY ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR BOARDS, A Corporation of the State of New Jersey, et al., Defendants.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
ORDER

This Court having entered a decision and order in this matter on June 28, 1983, (93 N.J. 470, 461 A.2d 1112), modifying and approving the consent judgment reported at 186 N.J.Super. 391, 452 A.2d 1323 (Ch.Div.1982), and the parties having been afforded an opportunity to consent to the judgment as modified, and the parties having submitted proposals to modify the judgment further, and the Court having reviewed those proposals, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that paragraphs one and two of the Final Consent Judgment are modified to provide that the last sentence in the Notice of Disapproval subparagraph of the ATTORNEY REVIEW clause of the contract or lease is to be deleted and the following sentence inserted in its stead, with the words "contract" or "lease" being used as required by the nature of the instrument:

The attorney may also, but need not, inform the broker(s) of any suggested revision(s) in the (contract) (lease) that would make it satisfactory.

and it is further

ORDERED that the term "Realtor" may be used in the ATTORNEY REVIEW clause instead of "Broker" by any person who is duly authorized by the National Association of Realtors to use that term; and it is further

ORDERED that the application of the defendants to have the effective date of the Decision and Order of this Court deferred to January 1, 1984, is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that objections to this Order, if any, shall be filed by the parties within 15 days of the filing date herein; and it is further ORDERED that in the absence of further action by the Court, the Decision and Order of June 28, 1983, as modified herein, shall become final 15 days after the filing date of this Order.

Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER and POLLOCK join in this Order.

Justice SCHREIBER dissents from this Order for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion, reported at 93 N.J. 470, 482, 461 A.2d 1112 (1983).

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Petition of Soto
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Octubre 1989
    ... ... Gloria E. SOTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, ... STATE of New Jersey, New Jersey Casino Control ... ...
  • Sears Mortg. Corp. v. Rose
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 29 Julio 1993
    ... ... corporation of New Jersey; Theodore Janulis & Helen ... Janulis; Stanley ... Bergen County, in the northern part of the state. (The division between north and south Jersey ... v. New Jersey Ass'n of Realtor Bds., 93 N.J. 470, 461 A.2d 1112, modified, 94 ... ...
  • Sullivan v. Max Spann Real Estate & Auction Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 9 Junio 2022
  • Kutzin v. Pirnie
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 27 Junio 1991
    ... ... Supreme Court of New Jersey ... Argued March 19, 1991 ... Decided June ... contract, the attorney must notify the REALTOR(S) and the other party named in this contract ... clause approved by this Court in New Jersey State Bar Association v. New Jersey Association of tor Boards, 93 N.J. 470, 461 A.2d 1112, modified, 94 N.J ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT