New Mexico Health and Social Services Dept. v. Chavez
| Decision Date | 10 August 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 9692,9692 |
| Citation | 85 N.M. 447,1973 NMSC 81,513 P.2d 184 |
| Parties | NEW MEXICO HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, v. Ossie CHAVEZ, Respondent. |
| Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
This case arose by way of an administrative hearing before the Health and Social Services Department. Mrs. Ossie Chavez, a 47-year-old diabetic with advanced heart disease was terminated from financial and medical assistance by the Department. Her reapplication for aid was denied and from that denial she appealed. The administrative appeal was denied and from the decision she perfected an appeal to the court of appeals. The court of appeals, 84 N.M. 734, 507 P.2d 795, reversed the Department and declared Mrs. Chavez eligible for public assistance. The Department moved for rehearing in the court of appeals and that motion was denied. The Department then petitioned this Court for review by way of certiorari, alleging that the decision of the court of appeals was of such substantial public importance that it necessitated review by this Court. A writ of certiorari was issued on March 28, 1973.
The court of appeals found Mrs. Chavez to be eligible for public assistance by deducting from her income her medical expenses to arrive at a figure below the standard of need established by the Department. In so doing, the court has created a new category of persons eligible for such assistance. Since all such programs must be created and funded by legislative enactment, it is obvious to this Court that there cannot be available funding for such a program spontaneously created by court interpretation of existing legislation. The courts must be extremely careful in making such an interpretation, for in so doing, they indeed open up a Pandora's box. This Court cannot agree with the interpretation of § 13--1--11, N.M.S.A., 1953.
However, whatever may have been the public importance of this case at the time of the decision, that importance has been seriously eroded by the repeal of the statutes on which the decision was based and the supercession thereof by a new statutory framework. In its 1973 legislative session, the New Mexico Legislature passed Senate Bill 374, Laws of New Mexico 1973, Ch. 376, which repeals and supercedes § 13--1--11, supra. The obvious result, of course, is that § 13--1--11, which the court of appeals interpreted in this case is no longer the law within this jurisdiction. With the repeal of § 13--1--11 and the substitution of Senate Bill 374, it can hardly be said that a dispute as to the interpretation of the repealed § 13--1--11 is of such 'substantial public importance' as to warrant this Court's review.
In a companion Bill to SB 374, the 1973 session of the New Mexico Legislature, at the behest of the Department, enacted a medically needy health care program, and funded it. Laws of New Mexico 1973, Ch. 311. Given the present existence of a medically needy health care program in this State, it is hard to comprehend how the question of whether the court of appeals' construction of § 13--1--11 required the implementation of such a program rises to the level of 'substantial public importance' as to require this Court's review. With the repeal of § 13--1--11 and the enactment of the medically needy health care program, the result of this Court reviewing this action will have little impact on the State of New Mexico.
The current mootness of the court of appeals' statutory construction of the language 'decency and health' is evident, from a cursory comparison...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Appelman v. Beach
...because this Court has repeatedly stated that it will not decide abstract or moot questions. New Mexico Health & Social Services Dept. v. Chavez, 85 N.M. 447, 513 P.2d 184 (1973); New Mexico Bus Sales v. Michael, 68 N.M. 223, 360 P.2d 639 By this holding we are not saying that a party who h......
-
Health and Social Services Dept. v. Garcia
...must be extremely careful in creating programs which must be funded by legislative appropriations. New Mexico Health & Social Services Dept. v. Chavez, 85 N.M. 447, 513 P.2d 184 (1973). Respondents have sought to raise in their briefs before the Court of Appeals and in their brief before th......
-
Griego v. Health and Social Services Dept. of State
...of our holding in the case in that we had created a new unfunded category for assistance. New Mexico Health and Social Services Department v. Chavez, 85 N.M. 447, 513 P.2d 184 (1973). Before the Supreme Court acted, the legislature did two things which we deem significant. First, it deleted......
-
Montano v. Health and Social Services Dept.
...by Griego v. Health and Social Services Department, 87 N.M. 462, 535 P.2d 1088 (Ct.App.1975) and New Mexico Health and Social Services Department v. Chavez, 85 N.M. 447, 513 P.2d 184 (1973). Decision not arbitrary, capricious or an abuse of Appellants contend here that the department failed......