New Mexico v. Chakerian
| Docket Number | S-1-SC-35121 |
| Decision Date | 22 February 2018 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Chavez v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
...we must give effect to that language and refrain from further statutory interpretation." State v. Chakerian , 2018-NMSC-019, ¶ 10, 458 P.3d 372 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). "But courts must exercise caution in applying the plain meaning rule. Its beguiling simplicity may......
-
State v. Hobbs
...we must give effect to that language and refrain from further statutory interpretation." State v. Chakerian , 2018-NMSC-019, ¶ 10, 458 P.3d 372 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). {21} Section 31-1A-2(I) provides that "[i]f the results of the DNA testing are exculpatory, the di......
-
State v. Becenti
...operating under the DRA. "Statutory interpretation is a matter of law and is reviewed de novo." State v. Chakerian , 2018-NMSC-019, ¶ 10, 458 P.3d 372. When interpreting statutory language, "our main goal is to give effect to the Legislature's intent." State v. Almanzar , 2014-NMSC-001, ¶ 1......
-
State v. Smith
...the Act when the facts were undisputed); State v. Chakerian , 2015-NMCA-052, ¶ 10, 348 P.3d 1027 (same), rev'd on other grounds , 2018-NMSC-019, 458 P.3d 372.{6} Defendant admits that after the officers advised her about the Act, she refused to take a breath test and asked instead to take a......
