New Orleans & N.E.R. Co. v. George
| Decision Date | 16 November 1903 |
| Citation | New Orleans & N.E.R. Co. v. George, 35 So. 193, 82 Miss. 710 (Miss. 1903) |
| Parties | NEW ORLEANS & NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. ALFRED H. GEORGE |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
[Copyrighted Material Omitted]
FROM the circuit court of Lauderdale county. HON. GUION Q. HALL Judge.
George appellee, was plaintiff in the court below; the railroad company, appellant, was defendant there. The action was replevin for certain freights consigned to appellee and upon which the railroad company contended certain demurrage charges had accrued, and which plaintiff had declined to pay. The railroad claimed the demurrage under certain rules of the Alabama Car Service Association, to which it belonged, and of the Mississippi Railroad Commission. These rules were offered in evidence and are as follows:
RULES OF THE ALABAMA CAR SERVICE ASSOCIATION.
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
RULES OF THE MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD COMMISSION.
. . . .
. . . .
Plaintiff was engaged in the wholesale grain and feed business in Meridian. He handled large numbers of cars of hulls, feed stuff, grain, and other commodities requiring track delivery. Some of these cars were unloaded at Meridian, and some rebilled to other points. For convenience in unloading and handling freight, George had leased a portion of a warehouse which was located on a spur track known as the "Compress Track," the larger part of which was used by the Cotton Compress Company and other concerns; and, as their warehouses were situated further up the spur track, all of the ears used by them had to pass over that portion of the track to the use of which George was entitled, thus necessitating the reswitching and replacing of his cars; but the lease to George was made with full knowledge on his part of this condition of affairs George's warehouse only had trackage for four cars. It was the usual course of dealing between George and the railroad company that the ears were to be set into his sidetrack on arrival, without special demand, and the representatives of the Alabama Car Service Association would check the ears on the track each day to see that there was no unnecessary delay in the switching and placing of the cars. The railroad company also had an employe who was charged with the duty of checking all ears on the track, and this double checking was recorded in books kept for that purpose, and the results compared to guard against errors. On Saturday, December 7, 1901, a train of twelve cars loaded with cotton seed hulls, loose in bulk, reached Meridian consigned to George. On arrival this train was placed on the storage track, appellant contending that was necessary on account of the crowded condition of the compress track. On Monday, the 9th, the compress track being still crowded with cars,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
- Edward Hines Yellow Pine Trustees v. Holley
-
Gault Lumber Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
...the lapse of 48 hours, Sundays and legal holidays excepted, has been held not to be unreasonable as a matter of law." In Railroad Co. v. George, 82 Miss. 710, 35 So. 193, it said: "It is admitted that the amount charged under the demurrage rules is reasonable, and it appears to us that the ......
-
Gault Lumber Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
...lapse of 48 hours, Sundays and legal holidays excepted, has been held not to be unreasonable as a matter of law." ¶13 In Railroad Co. v. George, 82 Miss. 710, 35 So. 193, it is said: "It is admitted that the amount charged under the demurrage rules is reasonable, and it appears to us that t......
-
St. Louis Southwesters Railway Company v. State
... ... formed to facilitate the interchange and movement of cars is ... well stated in New Orleans & N. E. Rd. Co ... v. George, 82 Miss. 710, 35 So. 193; and the same ... court, in a thoughtful ... ...