New York Central Co v. United States, No. 58
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 87 S.Ct. 2094,18 L.Ed.2d 1307,388 U.S. 445 |
| Parties | NEW YORK CENTRAL R. CO. v. UNITED STATES et al |
| Docket Number | No. 58 |
| Decision Date | 12 June 1967 |
v.
UNITED STATES et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
John A. Daily, for appellant.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk, for the United States and others.
Peter T. Beardsley, Harry J. Jordan, William R. Rubbert, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., James E. Wilson, Guy H. Postell, Ferdinand Born, LeGrand A. Carlston, F. H. Lynch, Jr., Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, John S. Fessenden and Richard R. Sigmon, for appellees American Trucking Associations, Inc., and others.
PER CURIAM.
The motion of American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., to be added as parties appellee is granted.
The motion to affirm is granted and those portions of the judgment of the District Court from which appellant is appealing are affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Syriani, No. 300A91
...the evidence and decide the issue, citing Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) (constitutional right to counsel requires that, on an indigent's first appeal from his conviction, court-appointed c......
-
Luros v. United States, No. 18707-18711.
...Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449, 87 S.Ct. 2098, 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967); Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed.2d 1307 Nor did the government offer any competent evidence outside of the books themselves to demonstrate their pruriency. See United States v. Kla......
-
Marchetti v. United States, No. 2
...415, 99 L.Ed. 475 (1955)?' After argument, the case was restored to the calendar, and set for regargument at the 1967 Term. 388 U.S. 903, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1343. Counsel were asked to argue, in addition to the original questions, the following: '(1) What relevance, if any, has the r......
-
Hernandez v. Denton, Nos. 86-2139
...30 L.Ed.2d 819 (1972). See also, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) (discussing in a different context that a contention is not frivolous if "any of the legal points [are] arguable on......
-
State v. Syriani, No. 300A91
...the evidence and decide the issue, citing Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) (constitutional right to counsel requires that, on an indigent's first appeal from his conviction, court-appointed c......
-
Luros v. United States, No. 18707-18711.
...Books, Inc. v. United States, 388 U.S. 449, 87 S.Ct. 2098, 18 L.Ed.2d 1311 (1967); Aday v. United States, 388 U.S. 447, 87 S.Ct. 2095, 18 L.Ed.2d 1307 Nor did the government offer any competent evidence outside of the books themselves to demonstrate their pruriency. See United States v. Kla......
-
Marchetti v. United States, No. 2
...415, 99 L.Ed. 475 (1955)?' After argument, the case was restored to the calendar, and set for regargument at the 1967 Term. 388 U.S. 903, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1343. Counsel were asked to argue, in addition to the original questions, the following: '(1) What relevance, if any, has the r......
-
Hernandez v. Denton, Nos. 86-2139
...30 L.Ed.2d 819 (1972). See also, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 reh'g denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967) (discussing in a different context that a contention is not frivolous if "any of the legal points [are] arguable on......