New York Co v. People of the State of New York
Decision Date | 01 March 1897 |
Docket Number | No. 128,128 |
Parties | NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO. v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
John M. Bowers, for plaintiff in error.
Theodore E. Hancock and Wm. Henry Dennis, for defendant in error.
A statute of New York passed June 18, 1887, regulating the heating of steam passenger cars and directing guards and guard posts to be placed on railroad bridges and trestles and the approaches thereto (Laws N. Y. 1887, c. 616, p. 828), provides:
A subsequent statute, passed April 27, 1888 (Laws N. Y. 1889, c. 189, p. 250), so amended the first section of the act of 1887 that the heating of passenger cars, on other than mixed trains, by a stove or furnace kept inside the car or suspended therefrom, did not become unlawful until after November 1, 1888. The amendatory act further provided that in special cases the board of railroad commissioners could extend the time for a period not exceeding one year from November 1, 1888, for any steam railroad doing business in New York to heat its passenger cars by stoves or furnaces kept inside the car or suspended therefrom.
The present action was brought to recover penalties imposed for the violation of the above statutes.
The complaint filed in behalf of the people of New York charged the defendant, the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, a corporation of Connecticut, with having, in the operation of its railroad, on the 2d day of November, 1888, and on every subsequent day down to and including December 31, 1888, run trains of passenger cars over its route from the city of New York to Hartford and from Hartford to that city, and heated said cars, both on through trains and over that part of its road in New York on other than mixed trains, by stoves and furnaces kept within such cars, 'as the regular and usual method of heating said cars, and in cases other than those of accident and other emergency'; and that the board of railroad commissioners of New York had not extended the time of the defendant to heat its passenger cars by any stove or furnace kept inside its cars.
There was a verdict and judgment against the railroad company for the sum of $7,000, and $479.81 costs, disbursements, and allowance; in all, $7,479.81; that judgment having been affirmed by the court of appeals of New York, 142 N. Y. 646, 37 N. E. 568.
It is contended that the above statute of New York is repugnant to section 8 of article 1 of the constitution of the United States, providing that congress shall have power to regulate commerce among the several states, and to make all laws necessary and proper to carry such power into execution, and also to the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States, declaring that no state shall deprive any one of property without due process of law, nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
As these questions were properly raised in the state court, there is no doubt of our jurisdiction to re-examine the final judgment against the railroad company. Rev. St. § 709.
According to numerous decisions of this court (some of which are cited in the margin1), sustaining the validity of state regulations enacted under the police powers of the state, and which incidentally affected commerce among the states and with foreign nations, it was clearly competent for the state of New York, in the absence of national legislation covering the subject, to forbid under penalties the heating of passenger cars in that state by stoves or furnaces kept inside the cars or suspended therefrom, although such cars may be employed in interstate commerce. While the laws of the states must yield to acts of congress passed in execution of the powers conferred upon it by the constitution (Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 211), the mere grant to congress of the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the states did not, of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cobb v. Department of Public Works
...465, 8 S. Ct. 564, 31 L. Ed. 508; Hennington v. Georgia, 163 U. S. 299, 16 S. Ct. 1086, 41 L. Ed. 166; N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co. v. New York, 165 U. S. 628, 17 S. Ct. 418, 41 L. Ed. 853; Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. Ohio, 173 U. S. 285, 19 S. Ct. 465, 43 L. Ed. 702. It must, however, be ......
-
Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Central Stockyards Co.
... ... those of any other railroad operated in the state, that these ... are the counties in which live stock is principally ... loss to it." In C. & N.W. R. R. Co. v. People, ... 56 Ill. 376, 8 Am.Rep. 690, the railroad company attempted to ... Y., ... N.H. & H. R. R. Co. v. New York, 165 U.S. 628, 17 S.Ct ... 418, 41 L.Ed. 853; Hopkins v. U. S., 171 ... ...
-
State v. Packer Corp.
... ... deleterious effects, particularly upon young people, has ... become very general, and that communications are constantly ... finding their way into ... public order or convenience? Fifth Ave. Coach Co. v. New ... York, 221 U.S. 467, 55 L.Ed. 815, 31 S.Ct. 709; Com. v ... McCafferty, 145 Mass. 384, 14 N.E. 451." ... ...
-
Shepard v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.
... ... 2007-- 1 to ... 2007-- 2)), reducing passenger fares within the state about ... 33 1/3 per cent., and of April 18, 1907 (Gen. Laws 1907, c ... the people to the nation in the Constitution, is exclusive, ... may be exercised to ... Illinois, 94 ... U.S. 113, 135, 24 L.Ed. 77; Budd v. New York, 143 ... U.S. 517, 545, 12 Sup.Ct. 468, 36 L.Ed. 247); requiring track ... ...