New York Feed Company v. Leary Milky Way Productions, Inc v. Leary, No. 992
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; DOUGLAS |
Citation | 90 S.Ct. 817,25 L.Ed.2d 78,397 U.S. 98 |
Decision Date | 27 February 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 998,No. 992 |
Parties | NEW YORK FEED COMPANY, Inc., et al. v. Howard R. LEARY et al. MILKY WAY PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al. v. LEARY et al |
v.
Howard R. LEARY et al.
MILKY WAY PRODUCTIONS, INC., et al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Herald Price Fahringer, for appellants New York Feed Co., and others.
Ralph J. Schwarz, Jr., and Albert B. Gerber, for appellants Milky Way Productions, Inc., and others.
J. Lee Rankin and Stanley Buchsbaum, for appellee Leary.
Frank S. Hogan, pro se.
Michael R. Juviler, for appellee Hogan.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, pro se.
Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles A. La Torella, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for the Attorney General of New York.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Nelson, No. G78-115 CR5.
...As the Fifth Circuit said in the case United States v. Hughes, 413 F.2d 1244 (5th Cir. 1969), vacated on other grounds, 397 U.S. 93, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 77 (1970), the norm is to deny a request for restricted discovery. In this case, the government's bald statements fall far short of t......
-
Spock v. United States, No. 76 Civ. 4457 (VLB).
...apply the last highest state court determination. See Warner v. Gregory, 415 F.2d 1345, 1346 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 930, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 112 (1970); Calvert v. Katy Taxi, Inc., 413 F.2d 841, 846 (2d Cir. 1969); Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 378 F.2d 832, 851......
-
U.S. v. Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Schedule No. 1769., No. 685
...2245, 33 L.Ed.2d 312 (1972); Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288, 294-95 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (three judge court), Aff'd, 397 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970). Compare United States v. 31 Photographs, 156 F.Supp. 350 (S.D.N.Y.1957). With regard to "patent offensivenes......
-
Bryers v. State, No. 44667
...of obscenity is permissible. . . .' Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288, 294 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (3 judge court), aff'd, 397 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970) (per Finally, as for the contention that the logic of Stanley somehow limited Sub silentio the Roth-Memoirs' ......
-
United States v. Nelson, No. G78-115 CR5.
...As the Fifth Circuit said in the case United States v. Hughes, 413 F.2d 1244 (5th Cir. 1969), vacated on other grounds, 397 U.S. 93, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 77 (1970), the norm is to deny a request for restricted discovery. In this case, the government's bald statements fall far short of t......
-
Spock v. United States, No. 76 Civ. 4457 (VLB).
...apply the last highest state court determination. See Warner v. Gregory, 415 F.2d 1345, 1346 (7th Cir. 1969), cert. denied 397 U.S. 930, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 112 (1970); Calvert v. Katy Taxi, Inc., 413 F.2d 841, 846 (2d Cir. 1969); Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc., 378 F.2d 832, 851......
-
U.S. v. Various Articles of Obscene Merchandise, Schedule No. 1769., No. 685
...2245, 33 L.Ed.2d 312 (1972); Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288, 294-95 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (three judge court), Aff'd, 397 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970). Compare United States v. 31 Photographs, 156 F.Supp. 350 (S.D.N.Y.1957). With regard to "patent offensivenes......
-
Bryers v. State, No. 44667
...of obscenity is permissible. . . .' Milky Way Productions, Inc. v. Leary, 305 F.Supp. 288, 294 (S.D.N.Y.1969) (3 judge court), aff'd, 397 U.S. 98, 90 S.Ct. 817, 25 L.Ed.2d 78 (1970) (per Finally, as for the contention that the logic of Stanley somehow limited Sub silentio the Roth-Memoirs' ......