New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer, 8124.
Decision Date | 28 June 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 8124.,8124. |
Citation | 90 F.2d 817 |
Parties | NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. v. GAMER. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Charles R. Leonard, W. D. Kyle, and J. A. Poore, all of Butte, Mont., for appellant.
Carl J. Christian and William Meyer, both of Butte, Mont., for appellee.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.
This is the second appeal in this case.
The facts proved are not in their essence different from those presented to us on the former appeal. Gamer v. New York Life Ins. Co., 76 F.(2d) 543.
The appellant states its first contention on this appeal as follows:
Appellant describes what it "alleges" concerning suicide as an "affirmative defense." The policy insured against death in the sum of $10,000, and provided for the payment of a double indemnity in the event of death by accident, but that "Double Indemnity shall not be payable if the Insured's death resulted from self-destruction, whether sane or insane." (Italics supplied.)
Liability for $10,000 was admitted and that amount was tendered. The appeal concerns the verdict for $20,000; that is, for the second $10,000 of the double indemnity.
Evidence was introduced from which the jury could infer that the special defense of suicide had been established. The District Judge, following the language of the instructions approved in Travellers' Ins. Co. v. McConkey, 127 U.S. 661, 8 S.Ct. 1360, 32 L.Ed. 308, instructed the jury as follows:
And again:
The appellant insurance company assigns and asserts error in that portion of the instruction which states that the burden is on the defendant insurer to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Walter Gamer killed himself voluntarily, asserting the law to be that the burden of proof of suicide is not upon the insurer where it has raised the issue of suicide, but is on the plaintiff to show death by another accidental cause.
The situation in this case is the same as that in the case of Travellers' Ins. Co. v. McConkey, 127 U.S. 661, 664, 666, 667, 8 S.Ct. 1360, 32 L.Ed. 308, where the Supreme Court considered the question whether such an instruction was error; the policy clause in that case being identical to the one here. In that case the death of the insured by gunshot was under such circumstances as to allow inferences either of suicide or accident. In that case, as in this, there was a general denial that the death of the insured was occasioned by bodily injuries effected through external, violent, and accidental means, and the insurer pleaded specially that the decedent's death was caused by suicide.
The instruction to the jury which the Supreme Court held not error was:
Travellers' Ins. Co. v. McConkey, supra, 127 U.S. 661, 664, 665, 8 S.Ct. 1360, 1361, 32 L.Ed. 308.
The Supreme Court considered the two methods of raising the issues in the answer which, in that case, were as in the present one; that is, first, the issue presented by the general denial, and, second, the special issue presented as to suicide. Concerning the first issue it states (127 U.S. 661, at page 666, 8 S.Ct. 1360, 1362, 32 L.Ed. 308): "There is no escape from the conclusion that, under the issue presented by the general denial in the answer, it was incumbent upon the plaintiff to show, from all the evidence, that the death of the insured was the result, not only of external and violent, but of accidental, means."
In holding that the instruction in respect to the second issue as to suicide, i. e., that "the burden of proving this allegation by a preponderance of evidence rests on the defendant," was not error, the court held (127 U.S. 661, at page 667, 8 S.Ct. 1360, 1363, 32 L.Ed. 308): (Italics supplied).
This court has consistently relied upon and held in accord with the McConkey Case. In Prudential Ins. Co. v. Baciocco (C.C.A.) 29 F.(2d) 966, 967: Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Broyer 20 F.(2d) 818. ."
In the Broyer Case, referred to above, citing the McConkey Case, we held:
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Broyer (C.C.A.) 20 F.(2d) 818, 820.
The Carroll Case last relied upon above is from the Sixth Circuit, and it holds: International Life Ins. Co. v. Carroll (C.C.A.) 17 F.(2d) 42, 43, 50 A.L. R. 362.
The same rule is followed in this circuit in the earlier case of Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. McWhirter (C.C.A.9) 73 F. 444, 449, 450.
The insurance company contends that three cases from this circuit, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Blum (C.C.A. 9) 270 F. 946; Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Maher (C.C.A.9) 70 F.(2d) 441; and New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Breschini (C.C.A.9) 64 F.(2d) 887, have overruled this established...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
New York Life Ins Co v. Gamer
...in denying its motion for a directed verdict and in giving each of the quoted instructions. The Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed. 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 817. This Court granted a writ of certiorari. 302 U.S. 670, 58 S.Ct. 46, 82 L.Ed. —-. There are presented for decision, questions whether the tr......
-
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer
...involved have been sufficiently stated in our former opinions. Gamer v. New York Life Ins. Co., 9 Cir., 76 F.2d 543; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 817. There is new evidence for insurer concerning the character of the bullet and its angle of emersion from the back of Game......
-
Sankovich v. Life Ins. Co. of North America
...was held to present a question for the jury is Gamer v. New York Life Insurance Co., 76 F.2d 543 (9th Cir. 1935), after remand, 90 F.2d 817 (9th Cir. 1937), reversed, 303 U.S. 161, 58 S.Ct. 500, 82 L.Ed. 726 (1938), on remand, 106 F.2d 375 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 308 U.S. 621, 60 S.Ct. 29......
-
Johnson v. Green
...(or conduct) where not objected to cannot be raised on appeal. Batchoff v. Craney, 119 Mont. 157, 172 P.2d 308; also, New York Life Ins. Co. v. Gamer, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 817, certiorari granted 302 U.S. 670, 58 S.Ct. 46, 82 L.Ed. 517, reversed 303 U.S. 161, 58 S.Ct. 500, 82 L.Ed. 726, 114 A.L.......