New York Life Ins. Co. v. Feicht
Citation | 29 F.2d 318 |
Decision Date | 02 July 1928 |
Docket Number | No. 6015.,6015. |
Parties | NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO. v. FEICHT. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois |
Hamlin, Topliff & Cooper, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.
H. B. Jerry, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
This is a suit in equity to rescind for fraud the reinstatement of a policy of life insurance. The case has been reargued. Some authorities, particularly International Life Insurance Co. v. Mowbray (C. C. A. 7) 22 F.(2d) 952, which were not presented at the original hearing have been brought to the attention of the court.
The Illinois statutes provide:
"That from and after January 1, 1908, no policy of life insurance shall be issued or delivered in this state or be issued by a life insurance company organized under the laws of this state, unless the same shall provide the following: * * * (3) That the policy, together with the application therefor, a copy of which application shall be endorsed upon or attached to the policy and made a part thereof, shall constitute the entire contract between the parties and shall be incontestable after it shall have been in force, during the lifetime of the insured, for two years from its date, except for nonpayment of premiums * * * provided, that the application therefor need not be attached to or made a part of any policy containing a clause making the policy incontestable from date of issue." Smith-Hurd Rev. St. 1927, c. 73, § 261.
The policy in suit provides:
* * *"
The policy further provides:
"This policy * * * shall be incontestable after two years from its date of issue except for nonpayment of premiums."
The policy contains the provision:
"This policy takes effect as of the 6th day of June, 1923, which date is the anniversary of the policy."
The policy further provides:
The insured did not pay the premium due June 6, 1924, either when due or within 30 days from that date. On August 14, 1924, the insured executed and delivered the following:
He received from the company the following:
Plaintiff seeks rescission of the reinstatement of the lapsed policy on the ground that the statements in the application for reinstatement, that the insured was then, to the best of his knowledge and belief in good health, and that the insured, within 12...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
New York Life Ins. Co. v. Burris
...prescribed therein, was revived or reinstated after its lapse. New York Life Ins. Co. v. Buchberg, 228 N.W. 770; New York Life Ins. Co. v. Feicht, 29 F.2d 318; Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Pickering, 293 F. 496; Wastun v. Lincoln National Life Ins. Co., 12 F.2d 422; Great Western Li......
-
McMahon v. Cont'l Assur. Co.
...286 Ill.App. 605, 3 N.E.2d 288 (Abst.); Johnson v. Country Life Insurance Company, 284 Ill.App. 603, 1 N.E.2d 779;New York Life Insurance Company v. Feicht, D.C., 29 F.2d 318;Alper v. New York Life Insurance Company, D.C., 41 F.2d 956. In support of plaintiff's position that, regardless of ......
-
Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Ptohides
... ... the amount of $ 1,000 upon the life of James W. Ptohides. The ... father of the insured, William Ptohides, was named as ... the prior decision of the Supreme Court in Oplinger v ... New York Life Insurance Co., 253 Pa. 328, 98 A. 568, ... that it would have been held that even a formal ... Support for that view will be found in ... some decisions (N. Y. Life Ins. Co. v. Feicht, 29 ... F.2d 318; Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. Russ, 14 ... F.2d 27; Feierman v. Eureka Life ... ...
-
Garber v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
... ... only for transmission to the New York office of defendant and ... that defendant was not committed to the acceptance thereof ... for ... terms thereof. Jennings [193 Minn. 24] v ... Travelers Equitable Ins. Co. 173 Minn. 547, 218 N.W ... 104. The conditions in the receipt for the $134.30, which the ... Nelson v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. 58 Mont. 153, 190 P ... 927, 928; New York L. Ins. Co. v. Feicht (D.C.) 29 ... F.2d 318; Exchange Trust Co. v. Capitol L. Ins. Co ... 40 F.2d 687. None of these ... ...