New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 967 (U.S. 4/6/1964)

Decision Date06 April 1964
Docket NumberNo. 40.,No. 39.,39.,40.
Citation376 U.S. 967
PartiesNEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN and ABERBATHY ET AL. v. SULLIVAN.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Ante, p. 254. The motion of respondent for the apportionment of printing costs and fees is denied. Sam Rice Baker, M. Roland Nachman, Jr. and Calvin Whitesell on the motion. Herbert Wechsler for New York Times Co., in opposition.

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Street v. National Broadcasting Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • August 11, 1977
    ...* * * Because prior to New York Times v. Sullivan (1964), 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686, motion denied 376 U.S. 967, 84 S.Ct. 1130, 12 L.Ed.2d 83 Tennessee in defamation cases adhered to the rule of strict liability, * * * it is suggested that failure to exercise due care would......
  • Capital Broadcasting Company v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • October 14, 1971
    ...S.Ct. 113, 82 L.Ed. 141 (1937); Giant Food, Inc. v. F.T.C., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 227, 322 F.2d 977 (1963), cert. dismissed, 376 U.S. 967, 84 S.Ct. 1121, 12 L.Ed.2d 82 (1964), upholding 15 U.S.C. § 45 which empowers the FTC to prevent unfair and deceptive practices, including 9 See, United State......
  • Howard Gault Co. v. Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • June 30, 1988
    ...v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886, 928, 102 S.Ct. 3409, 3433, 73 L.Ed.2d 1215, 1245 (1982).112 New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 967, 84 S.Ct. 1130, 12 L.Ed.2d 83 (1964).113 See Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 73, 85 S.Ct. 209, 13 L.Ed.2d 125 (1964).114 We express no opinion as......
  • Roth v. Board of Regents of State Colleges
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Wisconsin
    • March 12, 1970
    ...free. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964), motion for rehearing denied 376 U.S. 967, 84 S.Ct. 1130, 12 L.Ed.2d 83. Whether error is to be accorded special significance here will require an evaluation of the setting in which it occurred, if it wa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT