Newman Erb v. Otto Morasch
| Citation | 20 S.Ct. 819,177 U.S. 584,44 L.Ed. 897 |
| Decision Date | 14 May 1900 |
| Docket Number | No. 249,249 |
| Parties | NEWMAN ERB, as Receiver of the Kansas City, Wyandotte, & Northwestern Railroad Company, Plff. in Err. , v. OTTO J. MORASCH and Eliza Morasch, as the Next of Kin of Irene Morasch, deceased |
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
Messrs. B. P. Waggener and A. H. Horton for plaintiff in error.
Mr. George B. Watson for defendants in error.
While in their briefs many matters are discussed with ful- ness and elaboration by counsel for plaintiff in error, we are of opinion that those of a Federal nature involved in this record are few in number and practically determined by previous decisions of this court. Of course, all questions arising under the Constitution and laws of Kansas are, for the purposes of this case, foreclosed by the decisions of the state courts. Turner v. Wilkes County Comrs. 173 U. S. 461, 43 L. ed. 768, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 464; Brown v. New Jersey, 175 U. S. 172, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 77, 44 L. ed. ——, and cases cited in opinion.
In September, 1888, the city council of Kansas City passed an ordinance regulating the running of railroad trains through that city. Section 2 and 8 are the only ones material to the present controversy. They are as follows:
Now, in respect to the Federal questions, we remark, first, that it is the duty of a receiver, appointed by a Federal court to take charge of a railroad, to operate such road according to the laws of the state in which it is situated. 25 Stat. at L. 436, chap. 866, § 2; United States v. Harris, 177 U. S. 305, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 609, 44 L. ed.——.
Second, that he is liable to suit in a court other than that by which he was appointed, even in a state court, for a disregard of official duty which causes injury to the party suing. McNulta v. Lochridge, 141 U. S. 327, 35 L. ed. 796, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 11; Texas & P. R. Co. v. Cox, 145 U. S. 593, 36 L. ed. 829, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 905.
Third, that a city, when authorized by the legislature, may regulate the speed of railroad trains within the city limits. Richmond, F. & P. R. Co. v. Richmond, 96 U. S. 521, 24 L. Ed. 734; Cleveland, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Illinois ex rel Jett, 177 U. S. 514, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 722, 44 L. ed.——. Such act is, even as to interstate trains, one only indirectly directly affecting interstate commerce, and is within the power of the state until at least Congress shall take action in the matter.
And, fourth, the sections quoted of the ordinance are not in conflict with those provisions of the 1st section of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which restrain a state from denying the equal protection of the laws. This last proposition seems to be the only matter requiring anything more than a declaration of the law and a citation of decided cases.
The contention here is that the exception of the Interstate Transit Railway Company from the provision in reference to the speed of its trains creates a classification which is arbitrary and without any reasonable basis, and therefore operates to deny the equal protection of the laws. Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Ellis, 165 U. S. 150, 41 L. ed. 666, 17 Sup. Ct. Rep. 255. If there were nothing in the record beyond the mere words of the ordinance we are of opinion tht...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Municipality of San Juan
...(1851)), the "direct-indirect" test (e. g., Smith v. Alabama, 124 U.S. 465, 8 S.Ct. 564, 31 L.Ed. 508 (1888); Erb v. Morasch, 177 U.S. 584, 20 S.Ct. 819, 44 L.Ed. 897 (1900) and Tribe, Op. Cit., § 6-4, P. 326, cases at nn. 10, 11) into the current doctrine. See, generally, Shalley, Op. 44 T......
-
In re Arkansas Rate Cases
... ... North Carolina Board, 171 U.S. 345, 350, 18 Sup.Ct. 862, ... 43 L.Ed. 191; Erb v. Morasch, 177 U.S. 584, 20 ... Sup.Ct. 819, 44 L.Ed. 897; Gladson v. Minnesota, 166 ... U.S. 427, 430, ... ...
-
Ex Parte Hollman.
...may be injured by the negligence of a fellow servant, were not made subject to the regulations. So in Erb, Receiver, v. Morasch, 177 U. S. 584, 20 Sup. Ct. 820, 44 L. Ed. 897, it was held that an exception of a dummy railroad operated by steam, or of an electric railroad, in an ordinance li......
-
Bd. of Com'rs of Johnson Cnty. v. Johnson
...270, 21 Sup. Ct. 128, 45 L. Ed. 186;American, etc., Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 21 Sup. Ct. 43, 45 L. Ed. 102;Erb v. Morasch, 177 U. S. 584, 20 Sup. Ct. 819, 44 L. Ed. 897;Petit v. Minnesota, 177 U. S. 164, 20 Sup. Ct. 666, 47 L. Ed. 716;Clark v. Kansas City, 176 U. S. 114, 20 Sup. Ct. ......
-
Table of Cases
...228 (1968), 670, 1585 Equality Foundation of Greater Cincinnati v. City of Cincinnati, 54 F.3d 261 (6th Cir. 1995), 1193 Erb v. Morasch, 177 U.S. 584, 20 S.Ct. 819, 44 L.Ed. 897 (1900), 865 Erie, City of, v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277, 120 S.Ct. 1382, 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000), 946, 1366, 1373, ......
-
The Dormant Commerce Clause: the Origin Story and the "considerable Uncertainties"- 1824 to 1945
...interstate commerce, and is within the power of the state until at least Congress shall take action in the matter. Erb v. Morasch, 177 U.S. 584, 585 (1900) (citations In Southern Railway Co. v. King, the Court at least attempted some distinction between direct and indirect: It has been freq......