Newman v. Home Life Ins. Co., 523

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
Citation122 S.E.2d 701,255 N.C. 722
Docket NumberNo. 523,523
PartiesGladys V. NEWMAN v. HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
Decision Date22 November 1961

Page 701

122 S.E.2d 701
255 N.C. 722
Gladys V. NEWMAN
v.
HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 523
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov. 22, 1961

Ottway Burton, Linwood T. Peoples, Asheboro, for plaintiff, appellant.

Page 702

Bryant, Lipton, Strayhorn & Bryant, by F. Gordon Battle, Durham, for defendant, appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The group policy was a contract between the insurance company and the employer. The plaintiff was a third party beneficiary. Her right against the insurance company terminated at the end of the grace period by reason of the failure on the part of her [255 N.C. 723] employer to keep the contract alive by paying the required premium. Although the plaintiff paid her employer, who defaulted, her recourse is not against the insurance company.

The judgment of the superior court is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Blue Cross-Blue Shield of Alabama v. Thornton, CROSS-BLUE
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • 10 Diciembre 1975
    ...F.2d 897 (10th Cir. 1957). Agency has been rejected in Couch v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co., supra; and Newman v. Home Life Ins. Co., 255 N.C. 722, 122 S.E.2d 701. The Couch case specifically notes that the cases which have held the employer to be the insurer's agent rely on stat......
  • Annexation Ordinance No. 300-X, In re, 18
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 1 Diciembre 1981
    ......whose function is the protection of life and property. Police protection is provided on a ......
  • Couch v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co., 68--246
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 4 Diciembre 1968
    ...Pa.) 102 Pittsb.Leg.J. 273; Rivers v. State Capital Life Ins. Co. (1957) 245 N.C. 461, 96 S.E.2d 431, 68 A.L.R.2d 205; Newman v. Home Life Insurance Company, 255 N.C. 722, 122 S.W.2d 701 (1963); Boger v. Prudential Insurance Company, 259 N.C. 125, 130 S.E.2d 64 (1964); and 1 Appleman, Insur......
  • Boger v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 164
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • 20 Marzo 1963
    ...to keep the policy in force. Deduction of the employee's wages by the employer was not payment to the insurer. Newman v. Home Life Ins. Co., 255 N.C. 722, 122 S.E.2d 701; Haneline v. Turner White Casket Co., 238 N.C. 127, 76 S.E.2d 372; Dewease Travelers' v. Ins. Co., 208 N.S. 732, 182 S.E.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT