Newman v. Queen City Coach Co

Decision Date28 June 1933
Docket NumberNO. 445.,445.
CitationNewman v. Queen City Coach Co, 205 N.C. 26, 169 S.E. 808 (N.C. 1933)
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesNEWMAN. v. QUEEN CITY COACH CO.

Appeal from Superior Court, Union County; Oglesby, Judge.

Action by Lilly Belle Newman, by her next friend, D. F. Newman, against the Queen City Coach Company.Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

The action was instituted for the recovery of damages for personal injury sustained by the plaintiff in a collision" between the car in which she was riding as a guest and a bus owned and operated by the defendant.The collision occurred in the nighttime, and the details thereof as given by the plaintiff are substantially as follows: "On the night of February 9th I had occasion to go to Indian Trail with the basket ball team and went with Herman Gaddy, Pauline Griffin and Katherine Trull in Mr. Gaddy's car.He is teacher at Benton Heights School, and also coach of the basket ball team.I did not pay Mr. Gaddy anything to carry me up there.I was really a guest in his car and had no control at all over it.Somewhere between Stouts and Indian Trail Mr. Gaddy turned his car around in the road.I did not tell him to, but it was suggested that he turn around, and before the turn was made I looked both ways on the road and there was nothing in sight.We started making the turn and we were almost turned around, pulling up toward Monroe, just barely moving, when over the hill we saw this bus, and I told him there was a car coming, and when we turned around in the road I observed another car coming from toward Monroe and saw the bus coming over the hill that way.* * * The bus was coming fast, very fast, * * * and from the time it came over the hill it did not decrease its speed, it was the same.The bus did not turn in the road, it came straight on.At the time the bus cameover the hill we were turning toward Monroe, we hadn't pulled off yet, we had about turned.The car had gotten across the center of the road and was on Mr. Gaddy's right of the center, on that side.The distance from the top of that hill to the place where the car was struck is, I should say, about 300 feet, somewhere around that."There was a conflict in the evidence with regard to the extent of plaintiff's injury.She testified that she was seriously and permanently injured, and there was testimony to the contrary.

The evidence for the defendant tended to show that the driver of the bus was keeping a careful lookout, and when he came to the top of the hill he saw a dark object in the) road ahead.In the meantime a truck with brilliant lights was approaching the dark object, and the driver contended that this prevented him from discovering that the dark object was an automobile attempting to turn around on a populous highway in the nighttime.The...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • Price v. Gray
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 1, 1957
    ...Absher v. City of Raleigh, 211 N.C. 567, 190 S.E. 897; Wright v. D. Pender Grocery Co., 210 N.C. 462, 187 S.E. 564; Newman v. Queen City Coach Co., 205 N.C. 26, 169 S.E. 808; Lunsford v. Asheville Mfg. Co., 196 N.C. 510, 146 S.E. 129 * *. ' The negligence of each party was a proximate cause......
  • Harper v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1937
    ...431, 130 S.E. 5; Campbell v. R. R., 201 N.C. 102, 107, 159 S.E. 327; Sanders v. R. R., 201 N.C. 672, 676, 161 S.E. 320; Newman v. Coach Co., 205 N.C. 26, 28, 169 S.E. 808; Johnson v. R. R., 205 N.C. 127, 133, 170 S.E. Keller v. R. R., 205 N.C. 269, 278-279, 171 S.E. 73; Jernigan v. Jernigan......
  • James v. Atlantic & E. C. R. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 23, 1951
    ...citations) 187 N.C. 348, 121 S.E. 608; Charnock v. Reusing Light & Refrigerator Co., 202 N.C. 105, 161 S.E. 707; Newman v. Queen City Coach Co., 205 N.C. 26, 169 S.E. 808; Johnson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 205 N.C. 127, 170 S.E. 120. See also citations in Haney v. Town of Lincolnton, 2......
  • Godwin v. Johnson Cotton Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1953
    ...Absher v. City of Raleigh, 211 N.C. 567, 190 S.E. 897; Wright v. D. Pender Grocery Co., 210 N.C. 462, 187 S.E. 564; Newman v. Queen City Coach Co., 205 N.C. 26, 169 S.E. 808; Lunsford v. Asheville Manufacturing Co., 196 N.C. 510, 146 S.E. In the case of Carolina Scenic Stages v. Lowther, 23......
  • Get Started for Free