NEWSOME v. NORTH CAROLINA

Decision Date14 October 1963
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Henry 64 v. City of Rock Hill
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 6 Abril 1964
    ... ... guilty of breach of the peace, and remanded the case to the Supreme Court of South Carolina 'for further consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 ... 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 44; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2, 84 S.Ct. 80, 11 L.Ed.2d 41; Newsome v. North Carolina, 375 U.S. 21, 84 S.C ... 80, 11 L.Ed.2d 41; Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U.S. 22, 84 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT