Newton Oil & Manufacturing Company v. Carr
Decision Date | 23 May 1910 |
Citation | 52 So. 353,97 Miss. 234 |
Parties | NEWTON OIL & MANUFACTURING COMPANY ET AL. v. JOSEPH C. CARR |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
March 1910
FROM the chancery court of Winston county, HON. JAMES F. MCCOOL Chancellor.
Carr appellee, was complainant in the court below; the Oil, etc company and others, appellants, were defendants there. From a decree in favor of complainant, defendants appealed to the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Decree reversed and cause remanded.
Rodgers & Brantley, for appellants.
The decree of the court below from which the appeal is prosecuted is manifestly erroneous and in so far as it adjudged the mortgage or deed of trust valid as against the creditors of the mortgagors is in the face of the decisions of this court. Harman v. Hoskins, 56 Miss. 142; Joseph v. Levy, 58 Miss. 843; Britton v. Criswell, 63 Miss. 394; Baldwin v. Little, 64 Miss. 126.
L. H. Hopkins, for appellee.
The mortgage or deed of trust was certainly valid on its face and not condemned by any decision of this court. The evidence showed that the mortgagor accounted for the proceeds of all sales made, and the decree of the chancery court should be affirmed.
On the 4th day of June, 1908, appellant recovered a judgment against James and William Wilson, composing the firm of Wilson Bros. On the 14th day of July following said judgment was enrolled in the office of the circuit clerk, and on the next day execution was issued thereon. Under this execution the sheriff was proceeding to sell the stock of goods belonging to said Wilson Bros., when appellee filed this bill in the court below, alleging that he had a prior lien on said stock of goods under a deed of trust executed to him thereon by said Wilson Bros. on the 5th day of June, 1908, and prayed for and was granted a temporary injunction enjoining said sale. The recital in the deed of trust relative to the stock of goods is as follows: "Also the entire stock of wares and merchandise now in said stores at High Point, Miss. and of wares and merchandise to be placed in said stores during the year 1908." To this bill a demurrer was filed alleging, among other things, that said deed of trust was void for the reason that it shows on its face that it was made to hinder, delay, and defraud creditors. This demurrer being overruled, appellant filed its answer, charging that said deed of trust was fraudulent and void as to creditors,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wood Preserving Corporation v. Coney Grocery Co.
... ... Chancellor ... Suit by ... the Coney Grocery Company and others against the Mitchell ... Lumber & Tie Company, wherein the ... v. Harvester Co., 110 Miss. 671, ... 95 So. 641; Yale v. Manufacturing Co., 63 Miss. 598; ... Lyons & Co. case, 38 So. 371; 299 F. 789; 293 F ... 469; Johnson v ... Dick, 27 Miss. 277; Newton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Carr, 97 ... Miss. 234 ... We ... earnestly ... ...
-
Ellis Jones Drug Co. v. Coker
... ... Suit by ... the Ellis Jones Drug Company against R. L. Coker and N. L ... Chapman. From the decree, complainant ... 394, ... Johnston v. Tuttle, 65 Miss. 492, 4 So ... 553, and Newton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Carr, 97 ... Miss. 234, 52 So. 353; and there is no ... ...
-
Walker-Durr Co. v. Mitchell
...52 So. 583 97 Miss. 231 WALKER-DURR COMPANY v. CORA MITCHELL ET AL Supreme Court of MississippiJune 13, 1910 ... ...