Newton v. Newton

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtVINJE
CitationNewton v. Newton, 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105 (Wis. 1911)
Decision Date21 February 1911
PartiesNEWTON v. NEWTON.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Circuit Court, Outagamie County; John Goodland, Judge.

Action by Jennie Newton against Avery Henry Newton. From an order modifying an alimony decree, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.J. E. Malone, for appellant.

Giles H. Putnam (Rubin & Lehr and Horace B. Walmsley, of counsel), for respondent.

VINJE, J.

On the 8th day of August, 1908, a judgment of divorce was granted to the plaintiff from the defendant, wherein, pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, it was adjudged that the defendant should pay the sum of $23 per month to plaintiff for her support and that of their infant child, about 5 years of age. She was also given the household furniture. At the time of the divorce the defendant, who was a railroad conductor, was earning from $100 to $150 per month. Afterward the defendant obtained an order to show cause why the provision in the judgment relating to alimony should not be modified, by requiring a less sum to be paid. The defendant, in the affidavit upon which the motion was based, alleged that he remarried; that he owned no property whatever; that he was 35 years old, a railroad conductor, and had not for the last two years earned to exceed $97 per month; that he had to contribute to the support of his aged mother; and that, owing to the increased cost of living and the decrease in his earning capacity, the payment of the monthly sum of $23 was excessive. In opposition to this affidavit plaintiff alleged that her cost of living had increased; that she did not earn to exceed $6 per month as a seamstress, which was the avocation she followed; that she had incurred some expense to collect unpaid...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Simpson v. Simpson
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • September 21, 1931
    ...discretionary authority to modify its former decree. (1 R. C. L., Alimony, par. 94, p. 948; Humbird v. Humbird, supra; Newton v. Newton, 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105; Haskell v. Haskell, 119 Minn. 484, 138 N.W. Gloth v. Gloth, 154 Va. 511, 71 A. L. R. 700, 153 S.E. 879.) BUDGE, J. Lee, C. J.,......
  • Baldwin v. Baldwin
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1948
    ...a divorced wife will not be disturbed unless manifestly unjust. Hooper v. Hooper, 102 Wis. 598, 78 N.W. 753,44 L.R.A. 725;Newton v. Newton, 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105;Gauger v. Gauger, 157 Wis. 630, 147 N.W. 1075; Goerner v. Goerner, 182 Wis. 18, 195 N.W. 879;Voegeli v. Voegeli, 204 Wis. 36......
  • Ashton v. Ashton
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • October 3, 1938
    ... ... Simpson, 51 Idaho 99, 4 P.2d 345; ... Cornelison v. Cornelison, 53 Idaho 266, 23 P.2d 252; ... Humbird v. Humbird, 42 Idaho 29, 243 P. 827; Newton ... v. Newton, 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105.) ... Jones, ... Pomeroy & Jones, for Respondent ... Authority ... of court to ... ...
  • Williams v. Williams
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1969
    ...Horel v. Horel (1952), 260 Wis. 336, 50 N.W.2d 673; Jackowick v. Jackowick (1968), 39 Wis.2d 249, 159 N.W.2d 54.3 See Newton v. Newton (1911), 145 Wis. 261, 130 N.W. 105; Polleck v. Polleck (1959), 8 Wis.2d 295, 99 N.W.2d 98.4 See, Radandt v. Radandt (1966), 30 Wis.2d 108, 140 N.W.2d 293; S......
  • Get Started for Free