Next Friend Of J C A-s A Minor v. Smith

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
CitationAdar v. Smith, 622 F.3d 426 (5th Cir. 2010)
Decision Date26 October 2010
Docket NumberNo. 09-30036.,09-30036.
PartiesOren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J C A-S a minor; Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J C A-S a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, In Her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant-Appellant.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Kenneth Dale Upton, Jr. (argued), Lambda Legal Defense & Educ. Fund, Inc., Dallas, TX, Spencer R. Doody, Regina O. Matthews, Martzell & Bickford, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Stuart Kyle Duncan, Asst. Atty. Gen. (argued), LA Dept. of Justice, Baton Rouge, LA, for Smith.

Richard Arthur Bordelon, Ralph Joseph Aucoin, Sr., Denechaud & Denechaud, L.L.P., New Orleans, LA, for LA Conference of Catholic Bishops, Amicus Curiae.

David Robert Nimocks, Alliance Defense Fund, Washington, DC, for Family Research Council and LA Family Forum, Amici Curiae.

William Duncan, Marriage Law Found., Lehi, UT, for Family Watch Intern., Amicus Curiae.

Mathew D. Staver, Anita Leigh Staver, Liberty Counsel, Maitland, FL, Stephen M, Crampton, Gen. Counsel, Mary Elizabeth McAlister, Liberty Counsel, Lynchburg, VA, for Liberty Counsel, Amicus Curiae.

Katharine Murphy Schwartzmann, ACLU Found. of LA, New Orleans, LA, for ACLU and ACLU of LA, Amici Curiae.

Lawrence John Joseph, Washington, DC, for Eagle Forum Ed. & Legal Defense Fund, Amicus Curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Jay C. Zainey, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion Feb. 18, 2010, 5th Cir., 597 F.3d 697)

(Revised Opinion March 5, 2010, 5th Cir., 597 F.3d 697)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will issue a supplemental briefing schedule in the near future.

1Judge King did not participate.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • Adar v. Smith
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 12, 2011
    ...to reissue the birth certificate. This panel opinion was vacated by our court's decision to rehear the case en banc. Adar v. Smith, 622 F.3d 426 (5th Cir.2010). This court must decide whether Appellees' claim for a reissued Louisiana birth certificate rests on the Constitution's full faith ......
1 books & journal articles