Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 93 C 5578.
| Court | United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois) |
| Citation | 913 F. Supp. 1088 |
| Docket Number | No. 93 C 5578.,93 C 5578. |
| Parties | NICHOLS MOTORCYCLE SUPPLY INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Ed Tucker Distributor, Inc. d/b/a Tucker-Rocky Distributing, a Texas corporation, and Lemans Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants. |
| Decision Date | 18 September 1995 |
913 F. Supp. 1088
NICHOLS MOTORCYCLE SUPPLY INC., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff,
v.
DUNLOP TIRE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Ed Tucker Distributor, Inc. d/b/a Tucker-Rocky Distributing, a Texas corporation, and Lemans Corporation, a Wisconsin corporation, Defendants.
No. 93 C 5578.
United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.
September 6, 1995.
Order Vacating Decision in Part Pursuant to Settlement September 18, 1995.
913 F. Supp. 1089
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1090
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1091
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1092
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1093
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1094
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED913 F. Supp. 1095
Joseph G. Bisceglia, James A. McKenna, Royce Richard Bedward, Steven P. Blonder, Jenner & Block, Chicago, IL, Richard P. Campbell, Campbell & DiVincenzo, Chicago, IL, Anthony S. DiVincenzo, Campbell & DiVincenzo, Chicago, IL, for Nichols Motorcycle Supply, Inc
Kenneth Henry Hoch, Robert Thomas Joseph, Patrick John Kelly, David E. Lieberman, Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal, Chicago, IL, for Dunlop Tire Corp.
Joseph E. Coughlin, Terrence Patrick Canade, Michael J. Gaertner, Lord, Bissell & Brook, Chicago, IL, for Ed Tucker Distributor, Inc.
Ethan Edward Trull, Alexander S. Vesselinovitch, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL, David J. MacDougall, Brennan, Steil, Basting & MacDougall, Janesville, WI, for Lemans Corp.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. The Facts ................................................................................1097
A. Nichols ...............................................................................1097
B. Dunlop ................................................................................1098
C. Metzeler ..............................................................................1099
D. Tucker/Rocky ..........................................................................1099
E. Parts Unlimited .......................................................................1099
F. Combined Market Share .................................................................1100
G. The Economic Experts ..................................................................1100
II. The Antitrust Conspiracy Claims ..........................................................1100
A. The Sherman Act § 1 ..............................................................1100
1. Count I: Per Se Violations .........................................................1101
a. Legal Standards .................................................................1101
b. The Plaintiffs Evidence .........................................................1105
(i) The Year 1991 .............................................................1105
(ii) The Year 1992 .............................................................1105
(iii) The Year 1993 .............................................................1107
(iv) March 1993-June 15, 1993 ..................................................1108
(a) March 15, 1993: Tucker/Rocky Article Quoting Bob Gregg (PX
382) .................................................................1108
(b) The March 22, 1993 Gregg Letter (PX 4C) ..............................1108
(e) March 22, 1993: Parts Unlimited Revises Price List (PX 444) ..........1109
(d) March 31, 1993: Phone Call (PX 624) ..................................1110
(e) Late March 1993: Mike Buckley Replaces Pat Log-Lie as Dunlop's
National Sales Manager ...............................................1110
(f) Late March 1993: Gregg Phone Call to Buckley Regarding Termination
of Distributors ......................................................1110
(g) April 1, 1993: Buckley Memo To Dunlop Distributors (PX 2) ............1110
(h) The April 8, 1993 Gregg Letter (PX 5) ................................1110
(i) April Phone Call Between Buckley & Gregg Regarding April 8
1992 Gregg Letter ....................................................1111
(j) April 30, 1993: Logue Conversation with Motorcycle Stuff Regarding
Tucker/Rocky's Low Prices ............................................1111
(k) May 6, 1993: Buckley Visits Nichols, Meets Jack Jesse, and Writes
Call Reports (PX 14) .................................................1111
(l) May 6, 1993: Buckley Spends Evening with Jeff Fox of Parts
Unlimited ............................................................1112
(m) May 7, 1993: Buckley Visits Tucker/Rocky Warehouse in Chicago ........1112
(n) Early May 1993: "Firm Commitments" (PX 17) ...........................1112
(o) Late May 1993: Tucker/Rocky Issues Revised Price List (PX 214
PX 645) ..............................................................1112
(p) May 20,1993: Buckley's "Price War" Memo (PX 3) .......................1112
(q) Buckley's Memos to Robin Mitchell (PX 17; PX 18) .....................1113
(r) June 15, 1993: Dunlop Terminates Nichols (PX 16) .....................1114
(v) Post-Termination Evidence .................................................1114
(a) June 1993: Tucker/Rocky Branch Manager's Report (PX 277) .............1114
(b) Joe Piazza (PX 540) ..................................................1114
(c) Tucker/Rocky's Missing Branch Manager Reports ........................1114
(d) September 1993: Trade Show Memo (PX 206) .............................1114
(e) Metzeler Memo of October 5, 1993 on "Price Stability" (PX 303) .......1114
(f) Tucker/Rocky Memo Regarding "Market Stabilizing Programs"
(PX 280) .............................................................1115
(g) Dunlop Raises MSD Mid-Year ...........................................1115
...913 F. Supp. 1096(h) Rick Ward (DX 36) ....................................................1115 (i) 1994 Price Increases .................................................1115 (j) Tom Peterich .........................................................1115 (vi) Inadmissible Testimony ....................................................1115 (a) James Stewart ........................................................1115 (b) Rocky Trevino (PX 622) ...............................................1116 (c) Terry Baisley-William Giacomelli Conversation (PX 643) ...............1116 c. Analysis .......................................................................1116 (i) The Horizontal Agreement ..................................................1117 (ii) The Vertical Agreement ....................................................1118 (a) There is no evidence of parallelism supporting the inference of an agreement to terminate Nichols or to fix Prices ..........................................1118 (i) Market Theory .............................................................1118 (ii) Three Examples of Non-Parallel Behavior ...................................1119 (a) Dunlop Unilaterally Decided to Reduce Its Distribution Network........1119 (b) Parts Unlimited's 1993 Price Increases ...............................1121 (c) Tucker/Rocky and Parts Unlimited's 1994 Price Increases ..............1122 (b) The Gregg letters are ambiguous evidence and therefore do not support a inference of pricefixing or a termination agreement ............................1122 (i) The March 22, 1993 Gregg Letter ..........................................1122 (ii) The April 8, 1993 Gregg Letter ...........................................1124 (c) There is no other direct or circumstantial evidence of collusion supporting Nichols' section 1 claim .......................................................1125 2. Count II: The Rule of Reason .......................................................1125 a. Legal Standards .................................................................1125 b. Analysis ........................................................................1126 3. Count III: Group Boycott ...........................................................1128 B. The Illinois Antitrust Act ............................................................1128 1. Count IV: Per Se Pricefixing .......................................................1128 2. Count V: Rule of Reason ............................................................1129 3. Count VI: Group Boycott ............................................................1129 C. The Robinson-Patman Act Claims ........................................................1129 1. The Facts ..........................................................................1129 2. The Merits .........................................................................1130 a. Dunlop: Section 2(a) ............................................................1130 b. Tucker/Rocky and Parts Unlimited: Section 2(f) ..................................1132 3. The "Meeting Competition" Defense ..................................................1133 a. Background ......................................................................1134 b. Analysis ........................................................................1136 III. The State Law Claims .....................................................................1138 A. The Facts .............................................................................1138 B. Claims Against Dunlop .................................................................1139 1. Count VIII: Illinois Consumer Fraud Act. ...........................................1139 2. Counts IX & X: Illinois Franchise Act. .............................................1141 3. Count XI: Promissory Estoppel ......................................................1141 4. Count XII: Equitable Estoppel ......................................................1142 5. Count XIII: Equitable Recoupment ...................................................1142 6. Count XIV: Breach of Contract/Good Faith & Fair Dealing ............................1142 7.
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Docket No. 91494 — Agenda 7 — May 2003 (IL 8/18/2005), Docket No. 91494 — Agenda 7 — May 2003.
...expressly disagreed with the notion that the Act is limited geographically. See Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088, 1140 (N.D. Ill. 1995) ("This Court believes that the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, although intended to protect Illinois consumers, does not......
-
Avery v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 91494.
...expressly disagreed with the notion that the Act is limited geographically. See Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088, 1140 (N.D. Ill. 1995) ("This Court believes that the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, although intended to protect Illinois consumers, does not......
-
In re Potash Antitrust Litigation, Civil No. 3-93-197/RHK/RLE.
...Market Force Inc. v. Wauwatosa Realty Co., 906 F.2d 1167, 1172 (7th Cir.1990); Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F.Supp. 1088, 1117 (N.D.Ill.1995), vacated on other grounds, pursuant to settlement (September 18, Nevertheless, where an examination of the proffered "plu......
-
Avery v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 91494.
...expressly disagreed with the notion that the Act is limited geographically. See Nichols Motorcycle Supply Inc. v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F.Supp. 1088, 1140 (N.D.Ill.1995) ("This Court believes that the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act, although intended to protect Illinois consumers, does not co......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Newport Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tire & Battery Corp., 504 F. Supp. 143 (E.D.N.Y. 1980), 92 Nichols Motorcycle Supply v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. Ill. 1995), 51 Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, 99 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (E.D. Mo. 2000), 106 Nieman v. Dryclean Franchise Co., 178 F.3d 1126 (11......
-
Pricing Issues
...aff’d , No. 95-35095, 1996 WL 48401 (9th Cir. Feb. 6, 1996) (unpublished). But see Nichols Motorcycle Supply v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088, 1133-37 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (rejecting meeting competition defense when defendant could offer no objective evidence of competitive prices or pri......
-
Table of Cases
...2d 132 (D.D.C. 2002), 42 New York v. Reebok Int’l, 903 F. Supp. 532 (S.D.N.Y. 1995), 56 Nichols Motorcycle Supply v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. Ill. 1995), vacated , No. 93 C 5578, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14045 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 18, 1995), 91 Nichols v. Spencer Int’l Press, 371......
-
Robinson-Patman Act
...F.3d 1019, 1022-24 (9th Cir. 2013). 3. Automatic Canteen, 346 U.S. at 74, 79-81 (1953); Nichols Motorcycle Supply v. Dunlop Tire Corp., 913 F. Supp. 1088, 1132 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (vacated by settlement); Am. News Co. v. FTC, 300 F.2d 104, 110 (2d Cir. 1962); see also 1 ABA SECTION OF ANTITRUS......
Request a trial to view additional results