Nichols v. Estelle, 76-3108
| Citation | 556 F.2d 1330 |
| Decision Date | 05 August 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. 76-3108,76-3108 |
| Parties | Rush O. NICHOLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. J. ESTELLE, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent- Appellee. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
Frank D. Scarborough, Abilene, Tex. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
John L. Hill, Atty. Gen., Robert E. DeLong, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., W. Barton Boling, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Kendall, 1st Asst. Atty. Gen., Joe B. Dibrell, Gilbert Pena, Asst. Attys. Gen., El Paso, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Before COLEMAN, Circuit Judge, KUNZIG, * Associate Judge, and GEE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner was convicted in 1973 in Texas state court of robbery by assault 1 and was sentenced to life imprisonment under the Texas habitual offender statute. 2 He here alleges that the state improperly relied on a 1965 Oklahoma conviction to enhance his sentence for three reasons: (1) he was denied counsel on appeal from that conviction; (2) Texas law prohibits the use of a capital felony such as the Oklahoma conviction to enhance a noncapital felony such as the Texas conviction; and (3) the state failed to prove that petitioner was afforded an examining trial prior to the 1965 conviction. Because federal courts do not review a state's failure to adhere to its own sentencing procedures, 3 and because the Constitution does not require a state preliminary hearing, 4 only the first contention presents a possible basis for habeas corpus relief.
But petitioner's counsel failed to object to the admission of the Oklahoma conviction on the ground that counsel had not been provided on appeal. 5 This failure worked a waiver of the constitutional error complained of here. Wainwright v. Sykes, --- U.S. ----, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977); Loud v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1326 (5th Cir. 1977). See also St. John v. Estelle, 544 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1977).
The district court's order denying relief is AFFIRMED.
* Associate Judge of the U. S. Court of Claims, sitting by designation.
1 The conviction was affirmed on appeal. Nichols v. State, 511 S.W.2d 269 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). State habeas corpus relief was denied without written opinion.
5 A general objection on other grounds was made and overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Spinkellink v. Wainwright
...Tennon v. Ricketts, 5 Cir., 1978, 574 F.2d 1243 (1978); St. John v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1977, 563 F.2d 168 (en banc); Nichols v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1977, 556 F.2d 1330; Loud v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1977, 556 F.2d 1326, 1329-30. As for Spenkelink's contention that he had no other notice of the aggrav......
-
Hogue v. Johnson
...a procedural default bars federal habeas relief. See, e.g., Sharp v. Johnson, 107 F.3d 282, 285 (5th Cir.1997); Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330, 1331 n. 5 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied (1978) (contention that prior Oklahoma conviction, introduced at Texas trial, was void because of denial ......
-
Hogue v. Scott
...conviction was invalid because he did not have proper legal representation when he pleaded guilty to the offense. See Nichols v. Estelle, 556 F.2d 1330, 1331 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1020, 98 S.Ct. 744, 54 L.Ed.2d 767 Texas law is clear that an inmate cannot complain of admiss......
-
Allen v. Estelle
...protection when a prior conviction was used to enhance his punishment under the Texas habitual offenders statute. In Nichols v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1977, 556 F.2d 1330, Allen's co-defendant raised the identical argument and this Court found that such a contention failed to present a basis for ......