Nicholson v. Boles, No. 68
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; STEWART |
| Citation | 84 S.Ct. 89,11 L.Ed.2d 43,375 U.S. 25 |
| Parties | Warren V. NICHOLSON v. Otto C. BOLES. isc |
| Docket Number | M,No. 68 |
| Decision Date | 14 October 1963 |
v.
Otto C. BOLES.
Supreme Court of the United States
Warren V. Nicholson, pro se.
C. Donald Robertson, Atty. Gen. of West Virginia, and George H. Mitchell and J. Patrick Bower, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the confession of error by the Attorney General and upon an examination of the record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for further consideration.
Mr. Justice STEWART is of the opinion the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 practice notes
-
State ex rel. Smith v. Boles, No. 12485
...denied, 379 U.S. 864, 85 S.Ct. 130, 13 L.Ed.2d 67; State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles, 148 W.Va. 229, 134 S.E.2d 576, certiorari denied, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43; State ex rel. Clark v. Adams, 144 W.Va. 771, 111 S.E.2d 336, 89 A.L.R.2d 528, certiorari denied, 363 U.S. 807, 80 S......
-
State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles, No. 12292
...vacated the March 5, 1963 judgment of this Court and remanded this proceeding to this Court for further consideration. Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d Upon the remand of this proceeding it was submitted for decision January 8, 1964, upon the petition and its exhibit......
-
Swarb v. Lennox 8212, No. 70
...appeal of the other party is taken." 2. Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 286, 86 S.Ct. 438, 15 L.Ed.2d 336 (1965); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). See R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court Practice 224—225 (4th ed. 1969). 3. Cf. County of Alameda v. Car......
-
Lawrence v. Chater, 949323
...and state attorneys general, see, e.g., Cuffle v. Avenenti, 498 U.S. 996, 111 S.Ct. 553, 112 L.Ed.2d 560 (1990); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). This practice has some virtues. In an appropriate case, a GVR order conserves the scarce resources of this Cou......
4 cases
-
State ex rel. Smith v. Boles, No. 12485
...denied, 379 U.S. 864, 85 S.Ct. 130, 13 L.Ed.2d 67; State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles, 148 W.Va. 229, 134 S.E.2d 576, certiorari denied, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43; State ex rel. Clark v. Adams, 144 W.Va. 771, 111 S.E.2d 336, 89 A.L.R.2d 528, certiorari denied, 363 U.S. 807, 80 S......
-
State ex rel. Nicholson v. Boles, No. 12292
...vacated the March 5, 1963 judgment of this Court and remanded this proceeding to this Court for further consideration. Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d Upon the remand of this proceeding it was submitted for decision January 8, 1964, upon the petition and its exhibit......
-
Swarb v. Lennox 8212, No. 70
...of the other party is taken." 2. Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 286, 86 S.Ct. 438, 15 L.Ed.2d 336 (1965); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). See R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court Practice 224—225 (4th ed. 1969). 3. Cf. County of Alameda v. C......
-
Lawrence v. Chater, 949323
...and state attorneys general, see, e.g., Cuffle v. Avenenti, 498 U.S. 996, 111 S.Ct. 553, 112 L.Ed.2d 560 (1990); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U.S. 25, 84 S.Ct. 89, 11 L.Ed.2d 43 (1963). This practice has some virtues. In an appropriate case, a GVR order conserves the scarce resources of this Cou......