Nicholson v. Williams

Citation203 F.Supp.2d 153
Decision Date18 March 2002
Docket NumberNos. 00-CV-2229, 00-CV-5155, 00-CV-6885.,s. 00-CV-2229, 00-CV-5155, 00-CV-6885.
PartiesSharwline NICHOLSON, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nat WILLIAMS, et al. Defendants. Ekaete Udoh, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Nicholas Scoppetta, et al. Defendants. Sharlene Tillett, individually and on behalf of her infant children, and J.A. and G.A., infants on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Nicholas Scoppetta, et al. Defendants.
CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)

Lansner & Kubitschek, New York, By David Lansner, Esq., Carolyn Kubitschek, Esq., Joanne Sirotkin, Esq., Sanctuary for Families, Center For Battered Women's Legal Services, New York, By Jill Zuccardy, Esq., for Plaintiffs Subclass A.

Legal Aid Juvenile Rights Division, By Monica Drinane, Esq., Leslie Abbey, Esq., Barrie Goldstein, Esq., Kay G. McNally, Esq., Judith Waksberg, Esq., Henry Weintraub, Esq., Lawyers for Children, New York, By Karen Freedman, Esq., Karen Walker Bryce, Esq., Betsy Kramer, Esq., for Plaintiffs Subclass B.

Martha Olson, Esq., Citizens' Committee for Children, Riverdale, for Next Friend of Children in Subclass B.

New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel, Brooklyn, By Michael D. Hess, Esq., Jonathan Pines, Esq., Martha Calhoun, Esq., Carolyn Wolpert, Esq, Daniel A. Shacknai, Esq., Administration for Children's Services Deputy General Counsel, New York, for Defendant City of New York and Administration for Children's Services.

NYS Attorney General, New York, By William H. Bristow III, Esq., Robert

Kraft, Esq., for Defendant State of New York and Governor George E. Pataki.

Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Washington, D.C., By Greg E. Haber, Esq., Fernando R. Laguarda, Esq., Noam B. Fischman, Esq., for Amici National Network to End Domestic Violence and National Network to End Domestic Violence Fund.

Law Offices of Joanne C. Fray, Lexington, MA, By Joanne C. Fray, Esq., Helene Sullas Huggins, Esq., for Amicus National Coalition for Child Protection Reform.

Missouri Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Jefferson City, MO, By Nina Balsam, Esq., for Amicus Missouri Coalition Against Domestic Violence Against Women.

Davis Polk & Wardwell, New York, By Frank S. Moseley, Esq., Zachary S. McGee, Esq., Joan Loughane, Esq., Kelli J. Stenstrom, Esq., Of Counsel, New York County Lawyer's Association, New York, By Craig A. Landy, Esq., Norman L. Reimer, Esq., for Amicus New York County Lawyers' Association.

Ohio Domestic Violence Network, Columbus, OH, By Alexandria M. Ruden, Esq., for Amicus Ohio Domestic Violence Network.

Supplemental Memorandum, Findings of Fact and Law, and Order

Table of Contents

                  I. Introduction ............................................................. 163
                 II. Procedural History ....................................................... 164
                III. Facts .................................................................... 165
                     A. Current Institutional Framework ....................................... 165
                        1.  Reports to the State Central Register .............................. 166
                        2.  Child Protective Proceedings ....................................... 167
                     B. Plaintiff Families .................................................... 168
                        1.  Nicholson .......................................................... 168
                            a. Background ...................................................... 168
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Ms. Nicholson ......................... 169
                            c. Removal ......................................................... 169
                            d. Court Proceedings ............................................... 170
                            e. Subsequent Case History ......................................... 172
                        2.  Rodriguez .......................................................... 173
                            a. Background ...................................................... 173
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Ms. Rodriguez ......................... 173
                            c. Intervention by ACS and Removal ................................. 173
                            d. Court Proceedings and Further Removal ........................... 175
                            e. Subsequent Case History ......................................... 176
                        3.  Udoh ............................................................... 176
                            a. Background ...................................................... 176
                            b. Domestic Abuse Against Ms. Udoh ................................. 177
                            c. Abuse Triggering Removal ........................................ 178
                            d. Removal ......................................................... 178
                            e. Court Proceedings ............................................... 179
                            f. Subsequent Case History ......................................... 180
                        4.  Tillett ............................................................ 180
                            a. Background ...................................................... 180
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Ms. Tillett ........................... 180
                            c. Removal ......................................................... 180
                            d. Court Proceedings ............................................... 181
                
                        5.  Garcia ............................................................. 182
                            a. Background ...................................................... 182
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Ms. Garcia ............................ 182
                            c. Intervention by ACS ............................................. 183
                            d. Removal ......................................................... 184
                            e. Court Proceedings ............................................... 185
                            f. Subsequent History .............................................. 185
                        6.  Norris ............................................................. 185
                            a. Background ...................................................... 185
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Ms. Norris ............................ 185
                            c. Removal ......................................................... 186
                            d. Court Proceedings ............................................... 186
                            e. Subsequent History .............................................. 187
                        7.  Rhodes ............................................................. 187
                            a. Background ...................................................... 187
                            b. Intervention by ACS ............................................. 188
                            c. Removal ......................................................... 188
                            d. Court Proceedings ............................................... 188
                            e. Subsequent History .............................................. 188
                        8.  Berisha ............................................................ 188
                            a. Background ...................................................... 188
                            b. Removal ......................................................... 189
                            c. Court Proceedings ............................................... 189
                            d. Subsequent History .............................................. 190
                        9.  Jane Doe ........................................................... 190
                            a. Background ...................................................... 190
                            b. Investigation by ACS ............................................ 190
                            c. Domestic Violence Against Jane Doe .............................. 190
                            d. Removal ......................................................... 191
                            e. Court Proceedings ............................................... 191
                            f. Subsequent History .............................................. 191
                        10. Xiomara C .......................................................... 192
                            a. Background ...................................................... 192
                            b. Domestic Violence Against Mrs. C ................................ 192
                            c. Removal ......................................................... 192
                            d. Court Proceedings Against Ms. C ................................. 192
                        11. Other Cases ........................................................ 192
                     C. Modern Perspectives on Domestic Violence and Child Welfare ............. 193
                        1.  Historical Background .............................................. 193
                            a. Domestic Violence ............................................... 193
                            b. Child Welfare ................................................... 194
                        2.  Views of Experts ................................................... 197
                            a. Effects of Domestic Violence on Children ........................ 197
                            b. Effects of Removals on Children ................................. 198
                        3.  Best Practices ..................................................... 200
                            a. Mothers Should Not Be Accused of Neglect For Being Victims
                                of Domestic Violence ........................................... 200
                            b. Batterers Should Be Held Accountable ............................ 201
                            c. Children Should Be Protected by Offering Battered Mothers
                                Appropriate Services and Protection ............................ 202
                            d. Separation of Battered
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • U.S. v. Stein
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 26, 2006
    ...the criminal process simply by acting through DOJ policy rather than by statute or formal regulation. See, e.g., Nicholson v. Williams, 203 F.Supp.2d 153, 243 (E.D.N.Y.2002) ("In considering the constitutionality of the policy or practice of a state agency rather than the specific acts of i......
  • People v. JONES
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 30, 2010
    ...356 F.Supp.2d 1353; Lavallee v. Justices in Hampden Sup. Ct., supra, 442 Mass. 228, 812 N.E.2d 895; Nicholson v. Williams (E.D.N.Y.2002) 203 F.Supp.2d 153, 239–241, vacated and remanded sub nom. Nicholson v. Scoppetta (2d. Cir. Nov. 29, 2004) 2004 WL 2699925, 2004 U.S.App.LEXIS 24601 White ......
  • Nicholson v. Scoppetta
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • September 16, 2003
    ...on March 18, 2002, the District Court issued a lengthy opinion explaining the basis for the injunction. See Nicholson v. Williams, 203 F.Supp.2d 153 (E.D.N.Y.2002). This appeal followed. We denied the defendants' motion for a stay of the injunction pending The District Court's Findings of F......
  • Duke v. Duke
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • January 22, 2020
    ...Clare Huntington, The Empirical Turn in Family Law , 118 Colum. L. Rev. 227, n. 139, 252 (2018) (citing Nicholson v. Williams , 203 F.Supp.2d 153, 197-198 (E.D.N.Y. 2002), and noting opinions by five experts relating to potential adverse effects for children in a home where intimate partner......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT