Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
Decision Date | 17 July 1984 |
Docket Number | No. 83-765,83-765 |
Citation | 454 So.2d 328 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Parties | Robert G. NIDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. |
Robert G. Nida, pro se.
Dee D. Drell of Gold, Little, Simon, Wiems & Bruser, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant.
Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munsterman, DeWitt T. Methvin, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellee.
Before CUTRER, DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether plaintiff's insurance covered damage to his home caused by the condition of the soil beneath the foundation where the policy issued by defendant insurance company insured against loss caused by "collapse" but excluded losses resulting directly or indirectly from "earth movement". From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.
The trial judge assigned written reasons for judgment which we incorporate hereinbelow:
'D.1.1 All cracking noted herein in exterior walls and interior finishes appears to be the result of differential settlement caused from soil desiccation and shrink/swell under perimeter of foundation.
In his deposition, Mr. Beard explained how the foundation should have been constructed on this type of soil:
From that judgment plaintiff has appealed, assigning as error the trial court's finding that the "earth movement" exclusion in the policy excluded coverage of plaintiff's loss. Alternatively, plaintiff claims coverage under other provisions of the policy.
As noted by both parties, the jurisprudence is divided as to the meaning ascribed to both the term "collapse" and "earth movement". See--e.g.--Anno., Insurance Coverage--"Collapse of Building", 71 ALR 3d 1072; and Anno., Insurance--Earth Movement or Earthquake, 44 ALR 3d 1316. The policy herein insures for all risks of physical loss to the property except for loss caused by certain described risks including "deterioration; inherent vice; latent defect; settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging or expansion of pavements, patios, foundations, walls, floors, roofs, or ceilings."
Although settling is not defined in the policy, it does state that "collapse" does not include settling, cracking, shrinking, bulging or expansion." In addition, there is the aforementioned clause excluding losses resulting directly or indirectly from earth movement.
For many years the standard form of fire insurance contained a clause providing that if the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Murray v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.
...and causing foundation to settle eight inches; earth movement exclusion unambiguous and precluded recovery); Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 454 So.2d 328 (La.App.1984) (policyholder's home damaged when clay soil beneath home expanded and contracted; court found earth movement exclusion......
-
In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Products Liab. Litig..This Document Relates To Cases: 09–6072, 09–7393, 10–688, 10–792, 10–929, 10–930, 10–931, 10–1420, 10–1693, 10–1828.
...to coverage for the damage caused to their homes by Chinese-manufactured drywall. The Insurers rely upon Nida v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 454 So.2d 328 (La.Ct.App.1984), and Travco, 715 F.Supp.2d 699, to support this contention. The Insurers cite the definition of latent defect in Ni......
-
In re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Lit.
...less general. Dunham v. State, 140 Fla. 754, 192 So. 324, 325, 326.' Anderson, 127 So.2d at 306-07; but see, Nida v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 454 So.2d 328 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1984) (insurance definition of "collapse" in policy at issue revised to deny coverage for losses against settling).......
-
Karas v. Liberty Ins. Corp.
...expressly to define the term to provide for the limited usage it ... claims to have intended. See, e.g., Nida v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. , 454 So. 2d 328, 334 [ (La. App.), cert. denied, 458 So. 2d 486 (La. 1984) ]." Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. , supra, 205 Conn. at 251, ......
-
Chapter 4
...soil beneath was excluded by “earth movement” exclusion). State Courts: Louisiana: Nida v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., 454 So.2d 328 (La. App.), writ denied 458 So.2d 486 (La. 1984) (“earth movement” exclusion applied to bar coverage for loss caused by settlement, shrinking an......