Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton

Docket NumberA17-1142
Decision Date16 November 2017

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Cruz-Guzman v. State, A16-1265
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • July 25, 2018
    ...at 337. In addition, the interpretation of the constitution is a purely legal issue that we review de novo. Ninetieth Minn. State Senate v. Dayton , 903 N.W.2d 609, 617 (Minn. 2017).The complaint specifies that appellants brought this lawsuit under the Education Clause of the Minnesota Cons......
  • Olson v. Lesch, A18-1694
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 2019
    ...this court "avoid[s] reaching constitutional questions if there is another way to resolve the case." Ninetieth Minn. State Senate v. Dayton , 903 N.W.2d 609, 624 (Minn. 2017).Because applicability of this statute presents a question of first impression, we begin by interpreting the statute,......
  • In re Turner
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • August 9, 2021
    ...those branches have both an obligation and an opportunity to resolve those disputes between themselves." Ninetieth Minn. State Senate v. Dayton , 903 N.W.2d 609, 624 (Minn. 2017).The Supreme Court of New Mexico, asked to review the governor's veto by mandamus, noted that relief was not warr......
  • Jackson v. Comm'r of Human Servs.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 2018
    ...the branches" and "give due consideration to the equally important executive and legislative functions." Ninetieth Minn. State Senate v. Dayton, 903 N.W.2d 609, 623 (Minn. 2017) (quotations omitted). In Riley v. Jankowski, this court considered whether an administrative-hearing process viol......
  • Get Started for Free