Nixon v. Brown
Decision Date | 20 April 1923 |
Docket Number | 2560. |
Citation | 214 P. 524,46 Nev. 439 |
Parties | NIXON ET AL. v. BROWN ET AL. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
Appeal from District Court, Humboldt County; C.J. McFadden, Judge.
Action by Kate I. Nixon and others against W. A. Brown and others. Judgment for plaintiffs and defendants appeal. Reversed and remanded, with instructions.
Thomas A. Brandon, of Winnemucca, for appellants.
Warren & Hawkins and Warren & Dignan, all of Winnemucca, for respondents.
Respondents commenced an action in equity in the Sixth judicial district court of the state of Nevada to set aside a certain instrument designated a "deed of trust," executed on the 17th day of July, 1908, by the late George S. Nixon then United States Senator from Nevada, which position of honor and trust he held until his death, by which instrument certain premises situate in the town of Winnemucca, known as the "Nixon Opera House," were conveyed to certain residents of said town as trustees for the benefit of the people of Winnemucca, subject to certain conditions. The instrument was signed and acknowledged by the donor and delivered to the trustees on said date, who made written acceptance thereof on the instrument itself. The instrument is as follows:
M. S. Bonnifield. W. A. Brown.
Frank Germain. M. Reinhart.
George M. Rose. A. Seeliger.
J. Sheehan. M. D. Staunton.
A. F. Trousdale.
George S. Nixon, at the time of the execution and delivery of the instrument, was married to Kate I. Nixon, one of the respondents, the marriage having been solemnized January 30, 1887, at Humboldt, Nev. As a result of this union a son was born, as near as can be ascertained from the record, during the year 1888, to wit, Bertram E. Nixon, also a respondent in the action. George S. Nixon and Kate I. Nixon were living together as husband and wife at the time the instrument in question was executed, and it appears from the record that there never had been any agreement or settlement concerning property rights between them during the life of the former, and that the union in all respects was a happy one. It is admitted that the property conveyed by the deed of trust was community property, not a portion of a homestead; and that the wife never signed or otherwise consented in writing to the conveyance. Senator Nixon and his family resided for many years in Winnemucca, and were widely known and acquainted in that community. On the evening of April 20, 1907, at a farewell reception in the town of Winnemucca, given by the senator and his wife, the senator announced his intention to build and present to the town of Winnemucca an opera house. The corner stone of the structure was laid September 14, 1907, and was made the occasion of public exercises, at which Mrs. Nixon was present, Senator Nixon being absent. The structure was formally presented to the town July 17, 1908, the presentation having been made in the building itself. Senator Nixon made the presentation speech, and his wife was present and among those seated on the stage during the ceremonies. The conveyance above set forth was delivered to and accepted by the trustees at the time, and shortly thereafter was recorded in the office of the county recorder. Mrs. Nixon and Bertram Nixon during the early part of the evening assisted in receiving and welcoming the guests upon their arrival. The occasion was a public one. The cost of erecting and equipping the building and the premises upon which it is situate was about $50,000. Senator Nixon's wealth at the time of making the gift was estimated at between three and five million dollars, and at the time of his death he was admitted to be a millionaire. His death occurred June 5, 1912, and this action was commenced in the court below May 31, 1917.
Senator Nixon died testate, leaving surviving him the said Kate I. Nixon, his wife, and Bertram Nixon, his son. He disposed of his interest in the community property and all other property in trust, naming the Bank of Nevada Savings & Trust Company trustee, by the terms of which certain annuities were to be paid, the said Bertram Nixon to receive all the rest, residue, and remainder of the property of the estate upon his attaining the age of 35 years, subject to the further provision that, if the said Bertram Nixon should die before he arrived at the age of 35 years, the rest and residue and remainder of said estate should then go to Kate I. Nixon, and be added to her interest in the community property. Prior to the commencement of this action the property was distributed to the Nixon Estate Company (substituted for the Bank of Nevada Savings & Trust Company), subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions of the trust created by the will.
Respondents by their petition below sought to have the instrument in question set aside: First, upon the theory that in this state a husband cannot make a gift from the community property unless the wife joins in the conveyance, so as to preclude her from thereafter attacking the validity of the instrument second, that by the terms of said instrument, the trust created, if otherwise valid, was in law a private trust in perpetuity, prohibited by article 15, § 4, of the Constitution of the state of Nevada, and therefore void. Appellants by their answer denied the contention of pla...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Anderson v. Idaho Mut. Ben. Ass'n
...husband the management and control of the community property. Annotation, Gift of Community Property, 17 A.L.R.2d 1118. In Nixon v. Brown, 46 Nev. 439, 214 P. 524, the court held that a husband may make a reasonable gift of community property without the wife's consent, in the absence of an......
-
In re Swayze's Estate
...shade trees; a trust to preserve a forest and wild lands intact as a park to which visitors shall be allowed access.' In Nixon v. Brown, 46 Nev. 439, 214 P. 524, 531, a deed trust conveying a theatre building and lots upon which it was situated to trustees to hold and operate for the citize......
-
Kelly v. Kelly
...Spanish community property law as it existed in California at the time of its cession from Mexico, which Nevada adopted (Nixon v. Brown, 46 Nev. 439, 214 P. 524 (1923)), fruits and profits of the spouses' separate property was deemed community property. California, however, modified that cl......
-
Pink v. Busch
...65 Nev. 42, 6768, 188 P.2d 1006, 10171-18 (1948); Warren v. Wilson, 46 Nev. 272, 284-85, 212 P. 497, 497 (1923); Nixon v. Brown, 46 Nev. 439, 462, 214 P. 524, 532 (1923). See, e.g., Cobb v. Osman, 83 Nev. 413, 433 P.2d 259 (1967). Here, admissions in the pleadings and disputed testimony sho......