Nixon v. State, 8 Div. 145
| Decision Date | 16 October 1973 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 145 |
| Parties | Eddie NIXON, alias v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
After remandment by the Supreme Court, 291 Ala. 657, 286 So.2d 315: Affirmed (No opinion).
All the Judges concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Huff v. State
...... Smith v. State, 364 So.2d 1, 7-8 (Ala.Cr.App.1978). . "Neither the jury roll nor the ... In Nixon v. State, 51 Ala.App. 439, 286 So.2d 314 (Ala.Cr.App.1973), this Court ......
-
Wade v. State
......286 So.2d 317. 51 Ala.App. 441. Ex parte John Henry WADE. v. STATE. 2 Div. 72. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. Oct. 30, 1973. For Original ...834; Kingsley v. Bagby, 2 Kan.App. 23, 41 P. 991; State v. Boucher, 8 N.D. 277, 78 N.W. 988; Peeples v. State, 46 Fla. 101, 35 So. 223, 4 ......
-
Falk v. Falk
......FALK. Civ. 1282. Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. Feb. 8, 1978. Page 723. William H. Tucker, ... wife "grabbed" the children and took them out of the state. Based on the above incident, the husband ......
-
Washington v. State
...of proof to the contrary. Nixon v. State, 51 Ala.App. 439, 286 So.2d 314, reversed 291 Ala. 657, 286 So.2d 315, on remand 51 Ala.App. 705, 286 So.2d 317 (1973). Mere allegations contained in motions to quash the venire and indictment do not constitute proof. See: Lipscromb v. State, 53 Ala.......