NLRB v. Steel, Metals, Alloys and Hardware Fabricators and Warehousemen, Local 810
| Citation | 274 F.2d 688 |
| Decision Date | 29 January 1960 |
| Docket Number | No. 167,Docket 25808.,167 |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. STEEL, METALS, ALLOYS AND HARDWARE FABRICATORS AND WAREHOUSEMEN, LOCAL 810, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Respondent. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
William J. Avrutis, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on the brief), for petitioner.
Henry Brickman, New York City, for respondent.
Before CLARK, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.
On this petition, the sole issue is one of fact depending upon the credibility of conflicting testimony. The Trial Examiner accepted the testimony of Vignari, the office boy of the complaining company. He rejected the testimony of Robinson, the respondent's field organizer. The resolution of credibility was for the Trial Examiner who saw the witnesses under cross-examination. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456. The testimony relied upon was not "hopelessly incredible," nor in flat contradiction of "a so-called `law of nature' or undisputed documentary testimony." National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co., 2 Cir., 201 F.2d 484, 490; National Labor Relations Board v. James Thompson & Co., 2 Cir., 208 F.2d 743.
Enforcement granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
NLRB v. Reliance Fuel Oil Corporation
...2 E. g., N. L. R. B. v. Morris Fishman & Sons, Inc., 278 F.2d 792 (3 Cir.1960); N. L. R. B. v. Steel, Metals, Alloys and Hardware Fabricators and Warehousemen, Local 810, 274 F.2d 688 (2 Cir. 1960); Paramount Cap Mfg. Co. v. N. L. R. B., 260 F.2d 109 (8 3 Stenographic Transcript of Testimon......
-
NLRB v. International Longshoremen's & Ware. Union
...not be disturbed unless the testimony which he credits is hopelessly or inherently incredible. N. L. R. B. v. Steel, Metals, and Hardware Fabricators, etc., Local 810, 2 Cir., 1960, 274 F.2d 688; N. L. R. B. v. Davisson, 9 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 802; N. L. R. B. v. Dinion Coil Co., 2 Cir., 19......
-
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. Revere Metal Art Co.
...we cannot say that there was no substantial evidence to support the Board's order. N. L. R. B. v. Steel, Metals, Alloys and Hardware Fabricators and Warehousemen, Local 810, 2 Cir., 1960, 274 F.2d 688, 689; N. L. R. B. v. R. K. Baking Corp., 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d Enforcement is granted. * ......
- Lambert v. TRAVELERS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY