Noe v. Local 983, Motor Vehicle Operators Union
Citation | 2022 NY Slip Op 31833 (U) |
Decision Date | 10 June 2022 |
Docket Number | Index Nos. 154208/2022,001 |
Parties | JOLIFER NOE, CARMEN RODRIGUEZ, NATIVA PALMER, ERIC AUGUSTE, RICHARD RIVERA Plaintiff, v. LOCAL 983, MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATORS UNION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, JOE ORO, Defendant. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court (New York) |
2022 NY Slip Op 31833(U)
JOLIFER NOE, CARMEN RODRIGUEZ, NATIVA PALMER, ERIC AUGUSTE, RICHARD RIVERA Plaintiff,
v.
LOCAL 983, MOTOR VEHICLE OPERATORS UNION, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, JOE ORO, Defendant.
Index Nos. 154208/2022, 001
Supreme Court, New York County
June 10, 2022
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DATE 05/18/2022
AMENDED DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION
HON. LYLE E. FRANK JUSTICE
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 3, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 were read on this motion to/for _INJUNCTION/RESTRAINING ORDER
This petition arises out of a dispute regarding an upcoming election for the Local 983 Motor Vehicle Operators Union, American Federation of State, County and Municipal
Employees ("Local 983").[1] For the foregoing reasons, the Court grants Petitioners a preliminary injunction to enjoin Respondents from conducting its election until the deficiencies in the election process are corrected.
As a threshold matter, Respondents argue that Article 78 is in inappropriate for the petitioners to seek redress in this matter. The Court agrees. The Petitioners cite Matter of LaSonde v. Seabrook, 89 A.D.3d 132, 933 N.Y.S.2d 195 (N.Y.A.D. 1st Dept. 2011) for the proposition that union members may seek redress of the Courts through an Article 78 proceeding to ensure the union's compliance with its constitution. However, the sentence cited modifies the previous sentence which discusses when this applies i.e. where the union has incorporated.
However, an earlier sentence of the same decision does to this Court give the petitioner the opportunity to seek redress from this Court, and that is the sentence that the union's constitution constitutes a contract between the union and its member.
Therefore, although this matter was brought pursuant to CPLR Article 78, the Court exercises its authority exercise our authority under CPLR 103 (c), and in this particular case, nostra sponte convert the petition to a declaratory judgment action (see Matter of Medicon Diagnostic Labs. V Perales, 74 N.Y.2d 539, 544, 549 N.E.2d 124, 549 N.Y.S.2d 933 [1989] [noting that the Appellate Division had sua sponte converted the article 78 proceeding to a declaratory judgment action]; Matter of...
To continue reading
Request your trial