Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo

CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
CitationNoe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Decision Date15 November 1985
PartiesRobert J. NOE and Joan M. Noe, Appellants, v. PARK COUNTRY CLUB OF BUFFALO, James E. Rogers, Sr., and Daniel J. Rogers, Respondents.

Thielman & Jasen by Mark Jasen, Buffalo, for appellants.

Quinn & McGarry, P.C., by Kenneth Patricia, Buffalo, for respondents Rogers.

Cox, Barrell, Murrett, Ehman & Gersten by Mark Della Posta, Buffalo, for respondent Park Country Club.

Before DILLON, P.J., and CALLAHAN, DENMAN, BOOMER, and PINE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM:

The record of examinations before trial demonstrates that on July 9, 1981, plaintiff Robert J. Noe was playing golf at the Park Country Club. As the foursome of which he was a member left the ninth green, Noe proceeded to the tenth tee. Defendant Daniel Rogers was playing in a foursome immediately behind Noe's foursome. His ball was located 240 to 250 yards from the ninth green, in the rough, about five or six feet from the right edge of the fairway. After the Noe foursome left the ninth green, Rogers struck his ball toward that green but the shot sliced or faded to the right. He testified that as he observed the ball traveling toward the tenth tee which, according to the plaintiff, was "yards" from "the right edge of the green on the ninth hole as you face it", he yelled "fore". The club golf professional, who was standing behind the ninth green, heard the word "fore", but Noe did not. Rogers' ball struck Noe's head.

On these undisputed facts, Special Term properly granted summary judgment to the defendants. While it is well settled that a golfer has a duty to give a timely warning to other persons within the foreseeable ambit...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Rinaldo v. McGovern
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 16, 1990
    ...has no duty to warn persons who are not in the intended line of flight of an intention to hit the ball (see, Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846; see also, Jenks v. McGranaghan, 30 N.Y.2d 475, 479, 334 N.Y.S.2d 641, 285 N.E.2d 876). If a golfer owes no duty......
  • Cavin v. Kasser
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 19, 1991
    ...This view is supported not only in the cases cited in the Hoffman opinion but in the more recent case of Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846 (1985). See also Strand v. Conner, 207 Cal.App.2d 473, 24 Cal.Rptr. 584 (1962); Rose v. Morris, 97 Ga.App. 764, 104 ......
  • McDonald v. Huntington Crescent Club, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 3, 1989
    ...334 N.Y.S.2d 641, 285 N.E.2d 876; Jackson v. Livingston Country Club, 55 A.D.2d 1045, 391 N.Y.S.2d 234; cf., Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846). It is uncontested that the plaintiff Mark McDonald was standing near the intended line of flight and there are......
  • Richardson v. Muscato
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 4, 1991
    ...persons not in the intended line of flight on another tee or fairway of an intention to strike the ball" (Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846). Plaintiff Lawrence E. Richardson, who was in the vicinity of the 13th tee and about 20 to 25 feet from the 12th g......
1 books & journal articles
  • Chapter § 4.04 LIABILITY OF HOTELS AND RESORTS FOR COMMON TRAVEL PROBLEMS
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Travel Law
    • Invalid date
    ...v. Huntington Crescent Club, Inc., 152 A.D.2d 543, 543 N.Y.S.2d 155 (1989) (golfing accident); Noe v. Park Country Club of Buffalo, 115 A.D.2d 230, 495 N.Y.S.2d 846 (1985) (golfing accident).[479] See, e.g.: First Circuit: Zuckerman v. Camp Laurel, 2010 WL 746049 (D. Me. 2010) ("Samantha Zu......