Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc, 77-1034

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationNogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc, 435 U.S. 951, 98 S.Ct. 1578, 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978)
Decision Date03 April 1978
Docket NumberNo. 77-1034,77-1034
PartiesNicolas NOGUERAS, Jr., et al., petitioners, v. PUERTO RICO INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., et al

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
104 cases
  • Durante Bros. and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • October 1, 1984
    ... ... Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961, et seq. (1982), and the ... 2d 15, 23 (2d Cir.1974); see also International Halliwell Mines, Ltd. v. Continental Copper & ... ...
  • Chambers Devel. Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • July 6, 1984
    ... ... 1528 ... CHAMBERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, ... BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES, ... § 1961, et seq. ("RICO"), the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, et ... Pan American World Airlines", 336 F.Supp. 543 (E.D.Pa.1971) ...      \xC2" ... New Japan Securities International, Inc., 545 F.Supp. 1002, 1007 (C.D.Cal.1982) ... ...
  • U.S. v. Porcelli
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • January 11, 1989
    ... ... Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1962(c) (1982). These acts all ... management company, Ditmas Oil Associates, Inc. ("Ditmas"). Ditmas was the parent company of ... ...
  • U.S. v. Huber
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 20, 1979
    ... ... found to be wholly owned by appellant: Tudor, Inc. (Tudor), Boden, Inc. (Boden), Atlantic Medical ... Influenced and Corrupt Organizations" (RICO). The purpose of RICO is to enable law ... ...
  • Get Started for Free