Noojin v. United States
| Decision Date | 10 November 1908 |
| Docket Number | 1,751. |
| Citation | 164 F. 692 |
| Parties | NOOJIN v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama.
For opinion below, see 155 F. 377.
P. E. Culli, for plaintiff in error.
Oliver D. Street and J. H. Montgomery, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.
The writ of error in this case was brought to review the action of the court in denying a motion to quash an execution. In the courts of the United States the refusal to quash an execution is not a final judgment. Boyle v. Zacharie, 6 Pet. 635, 637, 8 L.Ed. 527; Evans v. Gee, 14 Pet. 1, 10 L.Ed. 327; Loeber v. Schrader, 149 U.S. 580, 585, 13 Sup.Ct. 934, 37 L.Ed. 856.
Writ of error dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Parker
...is a final decision.In prior times, we said that "the refusal to quash an execution is not a final judgment." Noojin v. United States , 164 F. 692, 693 (5th Cir. 1908) (per curiam) (citing, inter alia, Loeber v. Schroeder , 149 U.S. 580, 585, 13 S.Ct. 934, 37 L.Ed. 856 (1893) ). Other circu......
-
Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.
...934, 37 L.Ed. 856; Sabadash v. Schavo, 6 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 923; Glinski v. United States, 7 Cir., 1937, 93 F.2d 418; Noojin v. United States, 5 Cir., 1908, 164 F. 692. Also non-appealable is an order denying a motion to enter final judgment. In the instant case one of two factual situati......
-
Barnett v. Conklin
...in admiralty, where the court denied a motion to set aside a decree previously entered. This, of course, was not a final decision. Noojin v. U.S., supra, simply followed general rule that a mere motion to quash an execution is not a final judgment. We have no doubt but that the order in thi......
-
Sherman-Clay & Co. v. Searchlight Horn Co.
... 214 F. 86 SHERMAN-CLAY & CO. v. SEARCHLIGHT HORN CO. No. 2,306. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 4, 1914 ... [214 F. 87] ... [Copyrighted Material ... ...