Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co., 2236.

Citation50 F. Supp. 432
Decision Date28 May 1943
Docket NumberNo. 2236.,2236.
PartiesNOONAN et al. v. FRUCO CONST. CO.
CourtUnited States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Missouri)

Patrick A. Lavin and William Cohn, both of St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiffs.

Philip C. Wise and Alroy S. Phillips, both of St. Louis, Mo., and Bert E. Church, of Omaha, Neb., for defendant.

COLLET, District Judge.

The defendant's motion to dismiss is sustained. The action seeks recovery under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., for wages said to be due guards employed during the construction of a group of buildings in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, known collectively as the Small Arms Ammunition Plant, which buildings it is alleged were to be subsequently, after completion, used for the production and manufacture of munitions for small arms "for trade, commerce and transmission from the State of Missouri to places outside thereof."

I am unable to bring myself to the conclusion that a guard employed to protect the premises upon which a building is being constructed is "engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce" within the meaning of the Act in question. For that reason, in my judgment, the employees described in the complaint in this cause do not come within the purview of the Act.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Adams v. Long & Turner Const. Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • March 3, 1947
    ......206, 207, 208. (5) Respondents' Cases under "Engaged in Commerce" Distinguished. Noonan v. Fruco Construction Co., 140 F. (2d) 633; Brue et al. v. J. Rich Steers, Inc., 60 F. Supp. 668; ......
  • Adams v. Long
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kansas
    • March 3, 1947
    ...... John C. Long and Robert W. Long Co-partners doing Business as Long Construction Company, and ... "Engaged in Commerce" Distinguished. Noonan v. Fruco Construction Co., 140 F.2d 633; Brue et al. v. ...          It was. said in Noonan v. Fruco Const. Co., 140 F.2d 633, by. the United States Circuit Court ......
  • Mills v. United Ass'n of Journeymen and Apprentices
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Western District of Missouri
    • March 28, 1949
    ...connection Judge Collet of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, when a Judge on the District Court, said in Noonan et al. v. Fruco Construction Co., 50 F.Supp. 432: "I am unable to bring myself to the conclusion that a guard employed to protect the premises upon which a building is ......
  • United States v. Kehoe
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • June 22, 1943
    ......R. H. Stearns Co. v. United States, 291 U.S. 54, 54 S.Ct. 325, 78 L.Ed. 647. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT