Nordyke v. King
Decision Date | 29 July 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 07-15763.,07-15763. |
Citation | 575 F.3d 890 |
Parties | Russell Allen NORDYKE; Ann Sallie Nordyke, dba TS Trade Shows; Jess B. Guy; Duane Darr; William J. Jones; Daryl N. David; Tasiana Westyschyn; Jean Lee; Todd Baltes; Dennis Blair, R.L. Adams; Roger Baker; Mike Fournier; Virgil McVicker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary V. KING; Gail Steele; Wilma Chan; Keith Carson; Scott Haggerty; County of Alameda; County of Alameda Board of Supervisors, Defendants-Appellees. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Esquire, Office of County Counsel, Oakland, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Rawlinson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial15 cases
-
State v. Sieyes
...to rehear the matter en banc. Although it cannot be cited as precedent "by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit," Nordyke v. King, 575 F.3d 890, 891 (9th Cir.2009) (Nordyke II), the panel decision persuasively applied the Second Amendment to the states via the due process clause. "The cruci......
-
Nordyke v. King
...standard of review for evaluating gun-control regulations. Nordyke IV was subsequently vacated and reheard en banc. See Nordyke v. King, 575 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.2009). But before the en banc panel issued its decision, the Supreme Court decided McDonald v. Chicago, ––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 302......
-
Dorr v. Weber
...the Second Amendment. The Ninth Circuit granted a rehearing en banc of the Nordyke panel decision on July 29, 2009. Nordyke v. King, 575 F.3d 890, 891 (9th Cir.2009). In the order granting the rehearing, the court directed that “[t]he three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as preceden......
-
U.S. v. Masciandaro
...and concurring in the judgment))). 18. It is worth noting that the Ninth Circuit has since voted to rehear Nordyke en banc. See 575 F.3d 890 (9th Cir.2009) (Order). Of course, it is also worth noting that the bulk of the panel opinion in Nordyke confronted an issue not present in this case,......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Making Second Amendment Law With First Amendment Rules: the Five-tier Free Speech Framework and Public Forum Doctrine in Second Amendment Jurisprudence
...585 n.8 (2008) (listing provisions). 241. Id.at 584-85. 242. Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439, 451 (9th Cir.), vacated for reh'g en banc, 575 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. 243. State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann. 489, 490 (1850). 244. See Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 613 (2008). 245. See, e.g., David B. Kopel, The Na......
-
Second Amendment redux: scrutiny, incorporation, and the Heller paradox.
...granted, McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 48 (2009). (41.) Nordyke v. King, 563 F.3d 439, 446-49 (9th Cir. 2009), reh'g granted, 575 F.3d 890 (9th Cir. (42.) Id. at 448. (43.) Id. at 449. (44.) Id. at 457. (45.) Id. at 455-56. Notwithstanding its conclusion that the Second Amendment ......