Norero v. Board of County Com'rs of Grant County, 9121
Decision Date | 15 February 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 9121,9121 |
Parties | Carlos J. NORERO and Justine O. Norero, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GRANT COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | New Mexico Supreme Court |
The plaintiffs filed this suit in the District Court of Grant County against the Board of Commissioners of that County. Plaintiff Norero alleged ownership in fee simple of certain lands in Grant County upon which is located a dirt road running through plaintiff's property. Grant County claims that this road is a public road. The plaintiffs claim the road is a private one, and asked for a temporary restraining order against the County from going upon plaintiff's land and from declaring the road a public way. A temporary restraining order was granted and upon trial the restraining order was dissolved and the district court declared the road to be a County road. From this decision the plaintiffs appeal.
It nas been established that there are three methods of establishing public highways. For the first method we look to § 55--4--16, N.M.S.A. (1953 Comp.):
The second method of establishing a public highway is by dedication by the owner of the road to public use. The third method is by recognition of the road and maintenance of said road by the public authorities. Board of Com'rs of San Miguel County v. Friendly Haven Ranch Co. et al., 32 N.M. 342, 257 P. 998 (1927). See, also, hall v. Lea County Electric Cooperative, 78 N.M. 792, 438 P.2d 632 (1968).
The first method, in pursuance of the law of the state, § 55--4--16, supra, by agreement of all participants, was not followed. The second...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Biebelle v. Norero
...for plaintiffs. The easement with which we are concerned is upon lands involved in the case of Norero v. Board of County Commissioners of Grant County, 82 N.M. 300, 481 P.2d 88 (1971) but that case is immaterial to the present The first issue raised by defendants is whether the trial court ......
-
O'Brien v. Middle Rio Grande Conservancy Dist.
...roads (that is, open to public use) and private roads. Sections 67-2-1, 67-2-2, 67-10-4, N.M.S.A.1978; Norero v. Board of County Comm'rs of Grant County, 82 N.M. 300, 481 P.2d 88 (1971); Moore v. Armstrong, 67 N.M. 350, 355 P.2d 284 (1960). "We must presume that the legislature was informed......