Norfolk v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Decision Date | 19 May 1890 |
Parties | NORFOLK & W. R. Co. v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
M. E. Olmsted, for plaintiff in error,
W. S. Kirkpatrick and John F. Sanderson, for defendant in error.
The sixteenth section of an act of the legislature of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, approved June 7, 1879, (P. L. 112, 120,) provides as follows:
Under the authority vested in him by that statute, the auditor general of the state assessed a license tax against the Norfolk & Western Railroad Company, a corporation existing under the laws of Virginia and West Virginia, for each of the two years ending July 1, 1885, on its capital stock of $25,000,000, at the rate prescribed in the act, amounting to $6,250 a year, on account of its having an office for the use of its officers, stockholders, agents and employes in the city of Philadelphia. The case now before this court involves the claim of the state for the year ending July 1, 1884, only. As permitted by the laws of Pennsylvania, the company appealed from the auditor general's settlement tot he court of common pleas of Dauphin county, in that state. The case was tried in that court without the intervention of a jury, under an act of the state legislature approved April 22, 1874, and the court made the following findings of fact: Judgment was rendered against the company on that finding, sustaining the settlement made by the auditor general of the state, for the sum of $7,503.12. That judgment having been affirmed by the supreme court of the state, this writ of error was sued out. The assignment of errors is to the effect that the court below erred in refusing to sustain the following points, urged by the company, both in the trial court and in the supreme court of the state, viz.: '(1) Inasmuch as the sixteenth section of the act of June 7, 1879, denies to foreign corporations, and to the officers, agents, and employes of foreign corporations, the right to have an office or place of meeting in the state of Pennsylvania, the said section is in conflict with clause one of section two of article 4 of the constitution of the United States, which provides that 'the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges * * * of citizens in the several states.' (2) The sixteenth section of the act of June 7, 1879, is an abridgment of the privileges and immunities of the citizens of the United States; it discriminates between corporations of the state of Pennsylvania and corporations of other states; it discriminates between corporations and natural persons having offices in Pennsylvania; it discriminates between foreign corporations; it denies to foreign corporations, and to natural persons connected with such corporations, particularly this defendant and its officers, agents, and employes, who were in the state maintaining an office and doing business at and before the passage of the said act, the equal protection of the laws, and is for these reasons void, because in conflict with article 14 of the amendments to the constitution of the United States, and also because in conflict with the act of congress, (Rev. St. § 1977.) (3) Inasmuch as the Norfolk & Western Railroad Company engaged in the business of transporting freight and passengers to or from other states out of or into the state of Pennsylvania, or from other states to other states,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cobb v. Department of Public Works
...9 S. Ct. 256, 32 L. Ed. 637; McCall v. California, 136 U. S. 104, 10 S. Ct. 881, 34 L. Ed. 392; Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, 136 U. S. 114, 10 S. Ct. 958, 34 L. Ed. 394, were all decided before the first of the Interstate Commerce The Interstate Commerce Act (title 49, US......
-
Crescent Cotton Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Collins
... ... 489-497, 30 L.Ed. 694-697; 1st Inters. Com. Rep. 45; Crew ... Levick Company v. Pennsylvania, 245 U.S. , 62 L.Ed. 264 ... (B) ... That a corporation engaged in interstate commerce ... Wharton, 207 U.S. 328, 52 ... L.Ed. 230; Express Company v. Commonwealth, 214 U.S ... 218, 53 L.Ed. 972; Railroad Company v. Husen, 95 U.S. 465, 24 ... L.Ed. 527 ... ...
-
Roy Stone Transfer Corp. v. Messner
... ... 234 ROY STONE TRANSFER CORP. v. MESSNER et al. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. March 24, 1954 ... Action ... by non-resident corporation engaged in transportation ... commerce, against fiscal officers of Commonwealth, to ... restrain defendants from enforcing the Corporation Income Tax ... Law of 1951, a ... Prince v. Henneford, 305 U.S. 434, 59 S.Ct. 325, 83 ... L.Ed. 272; Norfolk & Western Railroad Co. v. Commonwealth ... of Pennsylvania, 136 U.S. 114, 10 S.Ct. 958, 34 L.Ed ... ...
-
State v. Salt Lake Tribune Pub. Co.
... ... v. United Press Ass'n, 204 F ... 217; City of Pueblo v. Lukins, 164 P. 1164; ... Norfolk, Etc., R. R. Co. v. Pennsylvania, 136 U.S ... 114; 10 S.Ct. 958; 34 L.Ed. 394; State v ... ...