Normandin v. Normandin

Docket Number2018-SC-0451-DG
Decision Date17 December 2020
The Supreme Court affirmed in part and reversed in part the judgment of the court of appeals affirming the order of the family court in this divorce action, holding that the family court miscalculated the combined monthly income for purposes of setting child support On appeal, Appellant challenged the family court's classification and division of marital property, calculation of maintenance, and calculation of child support. The court of appeals affirmed the family court's decision in its...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Ferguson v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 5 d5 Maio d5 2023
    ... ... also unable to support herself through suitable ... employment." Normandin v. Normandin , 634 S.W.3d ... 589, 602 (Ky. 2020), as modified and superseded on denial ... of reh'g (Apr. 29, 2021) (citing KRS ... ...
  • Scherba v. Scherba
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • 14 d3 Janeiro d3 2026
    ... ... "not include the stock as income to either party," ... we note it was called into doubt by Normandin v ... Normandin , 634 S.W.3d 589, 600 (Ky. 2020), opinion ... modified and superseded on denial of reh'g (Apr. 29, ... 2021), ... ...
  • Beets v. Beets
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 1 d5 Dezembro d5 2023
    ... ... "all relevant factors" but is not required to ... delineate every factor in its decision. Normandin v ... Normandin , 634 S.W.3d 589, 603 (Ky. 2020) (footnote ... omitted) ... These factors include "[t]he ability of the spouse ... ...
  • Dall v. Dall
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • 13 d5 Dezembro d5 2024
    ...from CDI. She explained that RSUs are given as compensation in which she receives one-third of the benefit per year for three years. In Normandin, the Kentucky Court explained: RSUs are "a form of equity-based compensation under which the issuer company promises to deliver whole shares of s......