Normus Realty Corp. v. Disque

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtThe Supreme Court, Bronx County, Special and Trial Term, William Lyman; The Appellate Division, Stevens
CitationNormus Realty Corp. v. Disque, 264 N.Y.S.2d 700, 16 N.Y.2d 912 (N.Y. 1965)
Decision Date21 October 1965
Parties, 212 N.E.2d 153 NORMUS REALTY CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Florence Coulter DISQUE, et al., Respondents, M. A. Gordon & Company, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Appellants, Carolyn S. Allers, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, 20 A.D.2d 277, 247 N.Y.S.2d 143.

Action to cancel restrictive covenatns affecting real property to permit erection of an apartment building.

The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Special and Trial Term, William Lyman, J., entered judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appealed.

The Appellate Division, Stevens, J., held that evidence revealed that character of tract subject to restrictive covenants requiring that only private single family dwellings be erected had not changed or deteriorated so as to defeat object and purposes for which restrictions were imposed where, though numerous apartment buildings had been constructed within eight block area of property, none had been erected within restricted area, and accordingly it was error to cancel covenants to permit erection of apartment building.

From judgment of the Appellate Division, the plaintiff app...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Cilberti v. Angilletta
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • October 29, 1969
    ...v. Leonard, 30 A.D.2d 745, 291 N.Y.S.2d 570; Normus Realty Corp. v. Disque, 20 A.D.2d 277, 247 N.Y.S.2d 143, affd. 16 N.Y.2d 912, 264 N.Y.S.2d 700, 212 N.E.2d 153; Pagenstecher v. Carlson, 146 App.Div. 738, 131 N.Y.S. Deterioration of the protected area itself must be shown (Bullock v. Stei......
  • Clintwood Manor, Inc. v. Adams
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 22, 1968
    ...that they have amply met that burden (Normus Realty Corp. v. Disque, 20 A.D.2d 277, 280, 247 N.Y.S.2d 143, 146, affd. 16 N.Y.2d 912, 264 N.Y.S.2d 700, 212 N.E.2d 153). Defendants argue that the fact that a majority of the property owners in the area have released the restrictions is not mat......
  • Huggins v. Castle Estates, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 1975
    ...are estopped from proceeding in derogation of that plan absent changed or special circumstances (compare Normus Realty Corp. v. Disque, 16 N.Y.2d 912, 264 N.Y.S.2d 700, 212 N.E.2d 153, with Clintwood Manor v. Adams, 24 N.Y.2d 759, 299 N.Y.S.2d 853, 247 N.E.2d 667). Whether or not a general ......
  • Gordon v. Incorporated Village of Lawrence
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 19, 1981
    ...Hayes v. Leonard, 30 A.D.2d 745, 291 N.Y.S.2d 570; Normus Realty Corp. v. Disque, 20 A.D.2d 277, 247 N.Y.S.2d 143, affd. 16 N.Y.2d 912, 264 N.Y.S.2d 700, 212 N.E.2d 153). Since the intended use would clearly violate the restrictive covenant, the defendant must be enjoined from employing its......
  • Get Started for Free