Norse v. City Of Santa Cruz, 07-15814.

• Decision Date: 12 March 2010
• Docket Number: No. 07-15814.,No. CV-02-01479-RMW.,07-15814.,CV-02-01479-RMW.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
• Parties: Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; Loran Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Department; Steven Clark, Defendants-Appellees.

598 F.3d 1061

Robert NORSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; Christopher Krohn, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of the City of Santa Cruz; Tim Fitzmaurice; Keith A. Sugar; Emily Reilly; Ed Porter; Scott Kennedy; Mark Primack, individually and in their official capacities as Members of the Santa Cruz City Council; Loran Baker, individually and in his official capacity as Sergeant of the Santa Cruz Police Department; Steven Clark, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-15814.

No. CV-02-01479-RMW.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Decided: March 12, 2010.

David John Beauvais, Oakland, CA, Kathleen Elizabeth Wells, Esquire, Law Office of Kate Wells, Santa Cruz, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

George J. Kovacevich, Esquire, Atchison, Barisone & Condotti A. Professional Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Prior report: 586 F.3d 697

ORDER

KOZ1NSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.