North American Transportation & Trading Co. v. Samuels

Decision Date20 June 1906
Docket Number1,273.
Citation146 F. 48
PartiesNORTH AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION & TRADING CO. v. SAMUELS.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Dudley Du Bose and J. K. Wood (Campbell, Metson & Campbell and S.D Woods, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

James E. Fenton, W. M. Madden, Albert Fink, M. J. Cochran, and T M. Reed, for defendant in error.

This is an action brought by the defendant in error to recover damages from the plaintiff in error for a breach of a contract entered into by the respective parties on April 19 1904. The complaint alleges:

'III. That on or about February 1, A.D. 1904, the said plaintiff then being at the place of business of the defendant, in the city of Chicago, Illinois, for the purpose of ascertaining from said defendant the freight rates on goods and merchandise which said plaintiff then contemplated purchasing and shipping to Alaska, said defendant then and there represented to the said plaintiff that it, the said defendant, then owned and had a general stock of merchandise, consisting of dry goods, clothing, boots and shoes, hats, caps, gents' furnishing goods, carpets, furniture and house furnishings, hardware, coal, groceries, and provisions, and other miscellaneous merchandise, in its warehouses and stores, in Nome, in the district of Alaska, of the value of more than $75,000, and that it, the said defendant, would have and own, at the opening of navigation, at Nome, Alaska, in the year 1904, to wit, on or about June 15, A.D. 1904, after selling from the said stock of merchandise in the ordinary and usual course of trade and business, merchandise of the kind hereinbefore enumerated and described of the value of at least $75,000, and that 40 per cent. or more of the said goods and merchandise of the said defendant, remaining on hand at the opening of navigation as aforesaid, would be and consist of dry goods and other merchandise above mentioned, other than and exclusive of groceries and provisions, and that all of the said goods and merchandise remaining on hand at the opening of navigation, as aforesaid, would be first-class and of merchantable quality, and at said time and place further represented to plaintiff that of the said goods and merchandise which the said defendant would have and own at the opening of navigation, as aforesaid, not more than 30 per cent. thereof, would consist of groceries and provisions, and it, the said defendant, at said time and place, for the purpose of inducing plaintiff to purchase all of the stock of merchandise aforesaid, which it, the said defendant, represented it would have and own at the opening of navigation, as aforesaid, at Nome, Alaska, then and there agreed with plaintiff that it, the said defendant, would sell to plaintiff all of the said goods and merchandise which the said defendant represented it would have at Nome, Alaska, at the opening of navigation as aforesaid, and which it, the said defendant, then and there represented would be merchantable and of first-class quality and of the amount and value of $75,000, and 40 per cent. or more of which the said defendant agreed should be and consist of dry goods, furnishing goods, and the merchandise above-mentioned, other than and exclusive of groceries and provisions, and that no more than 30 per cent. thereof should be groceries and provisions, at and for a price to be fixed and paid as mentioned in the written contract hereinafter set forth, and it, the said defendant, further agreed, at said time and place, that if the said plaintiff should purchase the said stock of goods and merchandise which it, the said defendant, then and there represented it would have and own in its said warehouses and stores at Nome, Alaska, at the opening of navigation as aforesaid, that it, the said defendant, would, between the date of the said contract of purchase and the opening of navigation, as aforesaid, sell the said goods and merchandise in the ordinary course of trade only, and not sell the same at a sacrifice or less and that, at the opening of navigation in the year 1904, the said defendant would deliver to plaintiff, at Nome, Alaska, the goods, wares, and merchandise of the kind, quality, and quantity and of the value hereinbefore stated; that the said plaintiff, relying solely upon the truth of the said representations of the said defendant, and not having any means of ascertaining the truth thereof, saving and excepting that derived from the said representations of the said defendant, did on or about the 1st day of February, A.D. 1904, agree to buy and purchase of the said defendant the goods and merchandise, with the express understanding and agreement that at least 40 per cent. thereof should consist of dry goods and furnishing goods of merchantable and first-class quality, and that not more than 30 per cent. thereof should consist of groceries and provisions, and with the further express understanding and agreement that the said defendant should not sell the said goods, which it, the said defendant, then represented it owned and had in its warehouses and stores in Nome, Alaska, save and except in the usual and ordinary course of business, and that none of said goods and merchandise should be sold at a sacrifice, or at less than cost, at the price stated and to be fixed and paid as mentioned, and in the manner set forth in the written contract hereinafter set forth; and plaintiff further alleges that he entered into this agreement, for the purchase of the said goods and merchandise, on the said representations of the said defendant that 40 per cent. or more of the said goods, wares, and merchandise should be goods other than groceries and provisions, and that not more than 30 per cent. thereof should consist of groceries and provisions, and not otherwise.
'IV. Said plaintiff further alleges that, relying solely upon the said representations of the said defendant, and with the express understanding and agreement above mentioned he, the said plaintiff, did on the 19th day of April, A.D. 1904, enter into a written contract with the said defendant in words and figures as follows, to wit:
'This agreement, made this 19th day of April, 1904, by and between the North American Transportation & Trading Company, a corporation of the state of Illinois, hereinafter called the seller, and Michael D. Samuels, of Nome, Alaska, hereinafter called the buyer, witnesseth, as follows: (1) The buyer agrees to buy and the seller agrees to sell all the merchandise, except liquors, cigars, tobaccos, and lumber, belonging to the seller in the warehouses and stores at Nome, Alaska, at the opening of navigation in 1904, at and for a price to be fixed as follows: To the 'outside' invoiced cost shall be added the freight, both as shown by the seller's books, and from the total shall be deducted 25 per cent. thereof, the remaining 75 per cent. of such outside cost plus freight to be the price. (2) The title of all merchandise so purchased, and of all merchandise, if any, substituted therefor under the conditions of this agreement, shall remain in the seller until the purchase price of all of said merchandise has been fully paid, and said seller shall select a cashier and bookkeeper as its representative to retain possession thereof until said purchase price is fully paid, who shall be paid by said buyer. (3) The sum of one thousand ($1,000.00) dollars, on account of said purchase price, is paid by the buyer to the seller upon the execution of this instrument, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and further sum of four thousand ($4,000.00) dollars on account of said purchase price shall be paid at the time said buyer begins to conduct the store now conducted by the seller at Nome, Alaska. The balance of the purchase price shall be paid at the rate of $7,500.00 per month, the first of such monthly payments to be made one month from the date when said buyer begins to operate said store. (4) The seller shall be further secured for the unpaid balance of said purchase price by the deposit in the store hereinafter mentioned of merchandise belonging to the buyer, and in case sales of the merchandise hereby sold shall exceed, after deducting expenses of the business, the sum of $7,500.00 per month, then such excess shall be paid on account of the purchase price, or such excess shall be used in the purchase of merchandise, to be placed in said store as security for the payment of the unpaid part of the purchase price. (5) The buyer assumes and

agrees to pay, from July 1, 1904, to July 1, 1905, the rent of $275.00 per month of the N.C. Co. Store on Front street in Nome, Alaska. (6) All merchandise owned by the seller, now in the warehouses at Nome, Alaska, shall be delivered to the buyer, free of storage charges. (7) The cost of insurance upon the merchandise hereby sold, and upon all replacements thereof, shall be paid by the buyer from the time when he begins to operate said store.

"Duly executed and delivered by the parties hereto, the day and year first above written.

"The North American Transportation and Trading Company, "By W. H. Isom, Vice-President. "M. D. Samuels.

-- duly attested by witnesses. And upon execution and delivery of said written contract the said plaintiff paid unto the said defendant the sum of $1,000 as a deposit upon the said agreement of sale, and the said defendant has not returned unto the said plaintiff any part thereof, although it, the said defendant, has violated and failed to perform its said contract and said plaintiff has demanded the return of the same.

'V. And said plaintiff further alleges that in the month of February, A.D. 1904, and immediately after said plaintiff had agreed to purchase the said stock of goods and merchandise which were to be of the quality, quantity, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. Diamond Dot Live Stock Co., 1661
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • 31 Marzo 1931
    ... ... 164, 17 Cyc. 741; Nor. Am ... Transportation Co. v. Samuels, 146 F. 48; DePue v ... McIntosh, (S ... in the extract above given from the American text writer on ... evidence. That case was one where the ... First National Bank, 15 Idaho 671, ... 99 P. 712; North American Transportation and Trading ... Company v ... ...
  • National Surety Corporation v. Laughlin
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 22 Febrero 1937
    ... ... Royal ... Indemnity Co. v. American Vitrified Products Co., ... 117 Ohio St. 278; Fitchburg ... Ham v ... Cerniglia, 18 So. 577; North American Transportation & ... Trading Co. v. Samuels, 146 ... ...
  • Lilienthal v. Cartwright
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 18 Octubre 1909
    ... ... 84, 35 L.Ed. 860; McElroy v. British American Assur ... Co., 94 F. 990, 997, 36 C.C.A. 615; North can ... Transportation Co., v. Samuels, 146 F. 48, 55, 76 C.C.A ... It ... ...
  • Standard Scale & Supply Co. v. Reiter
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 2 Enero 1912
    ... ... line and North of Wabash Railway running through Butler and ... North Am. Transportation & Trading Co. v. Samuels, ... 146 F. 48, 76 C.C.A. 506, ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT