North Carolina Wildlife, et al. v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp., et al.
| Docket Number | 11-2210 |
| Decision Date | 03 May 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
48 cases
-
Forestwatch v. Lint, Civil Action No.: 8:12–CV–3455–BHH
...agency has "examine[d] the relevant data and articulate[d] a satisfactory explanation for its action." N.C. Wildlife Fed'n v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 601 (4th Cir.2012) (alteration in original) (quoting F.C.C. v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 513, 129 S.Ct. 1800,......
-
Perez v. Cissna
...agency has "examine[d] the relevant data and articulate[d] a satisfactory explanation for its action...." N.C. Wildlife Fed'n v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 601 (4th Cir.2012) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting F.C.C. v. Fox Television Stations, In......
-
Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'ns v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior
...where the “no-action” alternative assumed the existence of the very plan being proposed); North Carolina Wildlife Fed'n v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 603 (4th Cir.2012) (“courts not infrequently find NEPA violations when an agency miscalculates the “no build” baseline or......
-
Defenders of Wildlife v. N.C. Dep't of Transp.
...Procedure Act (“APA”) governs our review of agency actions under NEPA and Section 4(f). See N.C. Wildlife Fed'n v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 601 (4th Cir.2012); Hickory Neighborhood Def. League v. Skinner, 893 F.2d 58, 61 (4th Cir.1990). A reviewing court may set aside an agency ......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related Risks and Other Risks in Project Delivery - National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)
...SEIS because agency failed to consider impacts of growth forecasts in evaluation of alternatives). 35 N.C. Wildlife Fed’n v. N.C. Dep’t of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 602-05 (5th Cir. 2012). 36 S.E. Alaska Conservation Council v. Fed. Highway Admin., 649 F.3d 1050 (9th Cir. 2011) (rejection of a......
1 books & journal articles
-
CHAPTER 6 NEPA'S SCIENTIFIC AND INFORMATION STANDARDS--TAKING THE HARDER LOOK
...impacts without any data for the vast majority of the BLM-managed lands). [100] See, e.g., N.C. Wildlife Fed'n v. N.C. Dep't of Transp., 677 F.3d 596, 603 (4th Cir. 2012) (holding that "agencies violate NEPA when they fail to disclose that their analysis contains incomplete information"). [......