North Dakota v. Azure
| Docket Number | 20160402 |
| Decision Date | 31 July 2017 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
6 cases
-
State v. Foster
...apply the abuse of discretion standard when "reviewing a district court’s evidentiary rulings under the hearsay rule." State v. Azure , 2017 ND 195, ¶ 6, 899 N.W.2d 294 (quoting State v. Vandermeer , 2014 ND 46, ¶ 6, 843 N.W.2d 686 ). [¶4] First, Foster argues Pollock testified to opinion t......
-
Blackcloud v. State
...overturn the district court’s decision to admit or exclude evidence unless the district court abused its discretion. State v. Azure , 2017 ND 195, ¶ 6, 899 N.W.2d 294 (citing State v. Vandermeer , 2014 ND 46, ¶ 6, 843 N.W.2d 686 ).[¶10] The district court did not abuse its discretion in det......
-
Vaagen v. Skorick (In re Interest of Skorick)
...was so prejudicial the defendant's rights were affected and a different result would have occurred absent the error. State v. Azure , 2017 ND 195, ¶ 22, 899 N.W.2d 294. [¶9] Here, it appears the district court relied on Dr. Benson's and Dr. Travis’ reports in making its decision. The distri......
-
State v. Watts
...rights must be disregarded." Therefore, a district court's evidentiary error does not require reversal if harmless. State v. Azure , 2017 ND 195, ¶ 22, 899 N.W.2d 294. "Stated simply, harmless error is error that is not prejudicial to the defendant." State v. Acker, 2015 ND 278, ¶ 12, 871 N......
Get Started for Free