North Dakota v. Gates
| Docket Number | 20200154 |
| Decision Date | 19 November 2020 |
Joan Gates appealed a district court order denying her motion for summary judgment filed in her criminal case. In 2013, a jury found Gates guilty of misapplication of entrusted property, a class B felony, for her actions while she was personal representative of the Estate of Lela Gates. The North Dakota Supreme Court concluded Gates’ appellate brief failed to provide the Court with a...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Argenti v. Buller (In re Interest of Buller)
...to support a party's position, and we will not consider arguments not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed." State v. Gates , 2020 ND 237, ¶ 8, 951 N.W.2d 223. In Gates , this Court found it was unable to meaningfully review the alleged errors of the district court when the appell......
-
Thomas v. State
...Hunter , 2020 ND 224, ¶ 10, 949 N.W.2d 841. Additionally, we will not consider arguments not adequately briefed. State v. Gates , 2020 ND 237, ¶ 8, 951 N.W.2d 223. Therefore, we decline to address those arguments.V[¶28] Thomas's remaining arguments are either without merit or not necessary ......
- Minard v. Moore (In re Moore)
-
Swanson v. State
... ... counsel) ... [¶3] ... Swanson also argues he was not afforded an opportunity to be ... heard on all of the issues because the district court limited ... the evidentiary hearing. We decline to address this argument ... See State v. Gates, 2020 ND 237, ¶ 8, 951 ... N.W.2d 223 (issues not adequately articulated, supported, and ... briefed are not considered on appeal). We summarily affirm ... under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7) ... [¶4] ... ...
