NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. United States

CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
CitationNORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. United States, 287 F.2d 884 (10th Cir. 1960)
Decision Date29 July 1960
Docket NumberNo. 6450.,6450.
PartiesNORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and Continental Oil Company, v. UNITED STATES of America.

W. J. Wehrli and Houston G. Williams, Casper, Wyo., and William M. Griffith, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Perry W. Morton, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Roger P. Marquis, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., and John F. Raper, Jr., U. S. Atty., Cheyenne, Wyo., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellants. D.C., 169 F.Supp. 735.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • UNICORN DRILLING v. HEART MOUNTAIN IRR., 98-122.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • April 7, 2000
    ... ... 594 (10th Cir.1973); Kinney-Coastal Oil Company v. Kieffer, 277 U.S. 488, 48 S.Ct. 580, 72 L.Ed ... Mountain, which has contracted with the United States to operate and maintain, and eventually to ... Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 277 F.2d 615, 618, ... ...
  • Taylor v. Morton, 6501.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • January 5, 1961
    ... ... J. C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, ... ...