Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Joseph Boyd, No. 47
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Lamar |
| Citation | 57 L.Ed. 931,228 U.S. 482,33 S.Ct. 554 |
| Docket Number | No. 47 |
| Decision Date | 28 April 1913 |
| Parties | NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY and Northern Pacific Railroad Company, Appts., v. JOSEPH H. BOYD |
v.
JOSEPH H. BOYD.
Page 483
The circuit court of appeals for the ninth circuit affirmed a decree subjecting the property of the Northern Pacific Railway Company to the payment of a judgment for $71,278, which Joseph H. Boyd had revived against the Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Company. The record on this appeal is very lengthy and the transactions so overlap that any chronological statement would necessarily be confusing. It will conduce to clearness to refer first to those between the Coeur D'Alene and the Northern Pacific Railroad and then set out as succinctly as possible the facts connected with the foreclosure of the Northern Pacific Railroad and its purchase by the Northern Pacific Railway.
In 1886 the Coeur D'Alene Railroad & Navigation
Page 484
Company constructed a narrow gauge railroad from Burke, Idaho, on the Northern Pacific Railroad, to Old Mission. Spaulding, in 1887, brought suit in an Idaho court to recover $23,675 for work done and material furnished in building it. Owing to the inaccessibility of the county seat in which the territorial court was held, and the fact that the terms were generally devoted to criminal business, there was much delay in getting a hearing. At last there was a trial, lasting forty days; but the presiding judge died before making his findings and entering judgment. His successor having been of counsel for one of the parties, was disqualified, so that it was not until 1896 that Spaulding recovered judgment against the Coeur D'Alene. Boyd claimed that this judgment belonged to him; and learning that Spaulding had threatened to transfer the judgment, Boyd, in 1898, instituted a suit to establish his title. It terminated in his favor in May, 1901. When the appeal was dismissed, the judgment against the Coeur D'Alene was about to become dormant. Boyd thereupon (1903) began proceedings in Idaho to have it revived, and on October 23, 1905, obtained a judgment against the Coeur D'Alene Company for $71,278, being the original debt with accumulated interest and costs. An appeal was taken, which was dismissed, and thereupon Boyd, in September, 1906, brought in a state court this suit against the Northern Pacific Railroad and the Northern Pacific Railway Company, claiming that the railroad was liable for this debt of the Coeur D'Alene, and that the railway in turn was liable for this debt of the railroad. The case was removed to the United States circuit court for the eastern district of Washington.
The Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation
The Coeur D'Alene Railway & Navigation 33 miles in length. D. C. Corbin was president and controlled 5,100 shares, which constituted a majority of the stock, which had been increased to $1,000,000, and all of which was unpaid.
Page 485
In 1888, while the Spaulding suit was pending, Corbin entered into a contract with the Northern Pacific Railroad in which he agreed to sell it his stock, stated to be full paid and nonassessable; to secure for it a lease of the Coeur D'Alene's property for 999 years and authority to issue $825,000 of mortgage bonds. The Northern Pacific was to pay the interest of 6 per cent on those bonds issued at the rate of $25,000 per mile on the 33 miles of road constructed, or to be constructed; and after a certain date to create and maintain a sinking fund for the redemption of the bonds at maturity; to pay for the value of material on hand, and $20,000 to cover amounts expended for surveys.
Corbin secured the adoption of resolutions authorizing the lease and the issuance of the bonds. On September 18, 1888, 5,100 shares of stock were transferred to the railroad, which entered into possession as lessee October 1, 1888, taking charge of all the matters relating to the Coeur D'Alene, including its litigation, although Corbin and the other officers did not immediately resign.
The resolution provided for the immediate issuance of $825,000 of bonds, $360,000 of which were to be retained to redeem the outstanding bonds for that amount. The agreement was silent as to what should be done with the remaining $465,000 of bonds, and the parties are at issue as to what use was, in fact, made of them. The railway insists that the records show that they were delivered by the mortgage trustee on October 29 and 30, 1888, upon the order of Corbin, president, part to him and part to another person. Boyd, however, contends that these bonds, $465,000, or their proceeds, were used to pay Corbin for the 5,100 shares of stock sold by him to the Northern Pacific Railroad, while the latter insists that the consideration for the transfer was, as stated in the contract, the railroad's guarantying the principal and interest of
Page 486
the bonds, and taking a lease of the property for 999 years, which provided for rental to be paid out of net earnings.
The evidence on this branch of the case is meager. On behalf of the defendant the records showed that on October 29 and 30, 1888, the bonds were turned over on the order of Corbin, president of the Coeur D'Alene Company. Corbin, who was an old man at the time of taking the testimony in 1907, stated that he received none of the bonds, but so much cash; that neither he nor his associates received any benefit from the mortgage, 'though I presume it was probably used to pay us. I know we got our money. . . . I do not think we received any bonds, unless possibly we might have received bonds with an agreement with somebody to take them off our hands and pay us the money, because I never had any bonds. . . . If they ever came into my hands at all, they just passed through my hands.'
A witness for the Northern Pacific, who had been its auditor in 1888, had no personal knowledge of the transaction, but testified that there was nothing on the books of the Northern Pacific which showed that it had ever received the $465,000 of bonds, or that it had ever paid anything for this stock. He did not think that the 33 miles of railroad cost $825,000, and supposed that the $465,000 of bonds went to Corbin and his associates. 'His rights and so on were worth something.'
In December, 1889, the railroad obtained, through Corbin, the remaining 4,900 shares of stock in the Coeur D'Alene, paying therefor $250,000. It changed the road from a narrow to a broad gauge at a cost of $150,000, and extended the line 16 1/2 miles at a cost of $750,000, and, as provided in the mortgage, issued $413,000 of additional bonds, being at the rate of $25,000 per mile. The cost of this extension, change in grade, and other betterments amounted to $910,000, or about $500,000 more than the
Page 487
Northern Pacific Railroad received from the sale of this last issue of $413,000.
The first twenty-one months after the lease the Coeur D'Alene's not earnings amounted to $176,000, and, as the lease provided that net earnings should be paid as rental, a dividend of 6 per cent was declared. Thereafter the earnings rapidly decreased and ultimately the books showed a loss. But the Northern Pacific Railroad, in accordance with the terms of the lease, paid the interest on the bonds until it was itself put in the hands of a receiver in 1893. He failed to pay the interest in 1895, and proceedings were instituted to foreclose the mortgages on the Coeur D'Alene Company. The property was sold under foreclosure in January, 1899, for $220,000, to the newly organized Northern Pacific Railway Company.
This left nothing for payment of Boyd's debt, and he insists that the lease and the diversion of the funds in purchase of Corbin's stock made the railroad responsible for the debts of the Coeur D'Alene, including his judgment. He further claims that the railway became liable for the payment of the same debt by virtue of new and independent proceedings now to be stated, under which the Northern Pacific Railway in 1896 acquired the property of the Northern Pacific Railroad.
On August 15, 1893, Winston and others filed in the United States court for the eastern district of Wisconsin a creditors' bill against the Northern Pacific Railroad, alleging that it was insolvent, its mortgage bonds amounting to about $140,000,000 and its floating debts to $11,000,000, and praying for the appointment of a receiver to preserve the property as an entirety, and to prevent it from being dismembered by separate sales under attachments and other liens. The company owned or controlled 54 subsidiary companies, and main and branch lines 4,700 miles in length. It also owned or was entitled to receive about 40,000,000 acres under land grants. There
Page 488
were six mortgages—some on one part of the property, some on another—and a general mortgage on the entire railroad lines. It also owned a large body of land which was not encumbered by liens. Interest had been paid on some of the bonds, but there had been a default in the interest on those secured by the junior mortgages.
Shortly after the filing of the creditors' bill a suit was brought in the same court by the trustees to foreclose these latter mortgages. The cases were consolidated and the receivership continued under the consolidated causes. The railroad demurred. As the road ran through several states, there were many questions of conflicting jurisdiction which were not settled until January 31, 1896, so that, except for administrative orders, no steps were taken in the litigation proper.
The representatives of the stockholders intended to resist the foreclosure, and while recognizing the superior claim of the bonds, advised that 'if properly protected, stockholders can secure equitable terms in any reorganization.' There were also representatives of the bondholders, and ultimately the two interests agreed upon a plan, the terms of which were stated by the reorganization committee which, March 16,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
32 195 Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Company of New York 8212 220, No. 70
...interests must be made whole before junior interests may participate in a reorganization has its roots in Northern Pacific R. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931. In that case Boyd was a general and unpaid creditor of the old corporation. In a reorganization Boyd was not f......
-
Boston and Maine Corp., In re, No. 83-1086
...v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Page 502 Co., 308 U.S. 106, 116, 60 S.Ct. 1, 7, 84 L.Ed. 110 (1939); Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 504, 33 S.Ct. 554, 560, 57 L.Ed. 931 Cambridge contends that the plan's awarding interest to lower priority claims of secured creditors whi......
-
Oldden v. Tonto Realty Corporation, No. 282.
...938, 939. 2 Moreover, attention had been called to the fact that this ruling, coupled with the doctrine of Northern Pac. R. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L. Ed. 931, might frustrate the hopes of debtors seeking by reorganization in bankruptcy to avoid their obligations under l......
-
In re Am., Docket Nos. 10–1175
...all “creditors were entitled to be paid before the stockholders could retain [shares] for any purpose whatever.” N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 507–08, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931 (1913). “[A] plan of reorganization,” the Court later stated, “would not be fair and equitable which .........
-
Boston and Maine Corp., In re, No. 83-1086
...v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Page 502 Co., 308 U.S. 106, 116, 60 S.Ct. 1, 7, 84 L.Ed. 110 (1939); Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 504, 33 S.Ct. 554, 560, 57 L.Ed. 931 Cambridge contends that the plan's awarding interest to lower priority claims of secured creditors whi......
-
Gully v. First Nat. Bank In Meridian, 33220
...Holding Co., 50 F.2d 138; Updike v. U.S. 8 F.2d 913; Adams v. Stonewall Co., 80 Miss. 94, 31 So. 544; Northern Pacific Ry. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 57 L.Ed. 931; Kansas City v. Guardian Trust Co., 240 U.S. 166, 60 L.Ed. 579; Central of Ga. v. Paul, [183 Miss. 397] 93 F. 879; Alberger Cond......
-
In re Richard & Stephanie Lucarelli Lucarelli's Exec. Answering Serv., LLC, CASE NO. 13-30350 (JAM)
...in the early part of the last century. See, Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers, 485 U.S. 197 (1988), citing to N. Pac. Ry. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482 (1913); In re Friedman, 466 B.R. 471, 478 (9th Cir. B.AP. 2012); 7 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1129.LH., p. 1129-191 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. S......
-
In re Lucarelli, Nos. 13–30350 JAM
...century. See, Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers, 485 U.S. 197, 108 S.Ct. 963, 99 L.Ed.2d 169 (1988), citing to N. Pac. Ry Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482, 33 S.Ct. 554, 57 L.Ed. 931 (1913) ; In re Friedman, 466 B.R. 471, 478 (9th Cir.BAP2012) ; 7 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1129.LH., p. 1129–191 (Al......
-
The Alteration of Ex Ante Agreements by the Bankruptcy Code.
...Co. v. Howard, 74 U.S. 392 (1868); Louisville Tr. Co. v. Louisville, N.A. & C. Ry. Co., 174 U.S. 674 (1899), N. Pac. R. Co. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482 (1913); Kan. City Terminal Ry. Co. v. Cent. Union Tr. Co. of N.Y., 271 U.S. 445 (244) Ayer, supra, note 241, at 975. (245) COMMISSION ON THE ......
-
Unwritten Law and the Odd Ones Out.
...Jared Ellias, Adam Levitin, Stephen Lubben, Josh Macey, David Skeel, and participants at a workshop at Wharton. (1.) N. Pac. Ry. v. Boyd, 228 U.S. 482 (2.) Paul D. Cravath, The Reorganization of Corporations; Bondholders' and Stockholders' Protective Committees; Reorganization Committees; a......