Northern v. Nelson, 26357.

Decision Date22 September 1971
Docket NumberNo. 26357.,26357.
Citation448 F.2d 1266
PartiesHarry NORTHERN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis S. NELSON, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

J. Roger Beers (argued), of Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Evelle J. Younger, Cal., Atty. Gen., Edward P. O'Brien, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Before WEICK*, BROWNING, and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The district court, 315 F.Supp. 687, granted injunctive relief on appellant's complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging infringement by prison authorities of his right to the free exercise of the Muslim religion. However, the court dismissed appellant's claim for damages.

Appellant argues that a cause of action for damages under the Act may be based upon a denial of religious freedom, citing Williford v. California, 352 F.2d 474 (9th Cir. 1965); DeWitt v. Pail, 366 F.2d 682, 686 (9th Cir. 1966); and Wilson v. Prasse, 404 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1968). Appellee accepts this legal proposition, but argues that appellant's damage claim was properly denied as de minimis. We agree.

The original complaint did not request damages. Damages were mentioned briefly in a memorandum filed in support of the complaint by appellant's appointed counsel. The court subsequently held four hearings to consider and rule upon the contentions of the parties and to work out a decree. Only once, in the third of these hearings, were damages mentioned. The court said, "That just about wraps up everything except damages. As to the seven copies of the newspaper seven copies of "Muhammad Speaks," allegedly confiscated by prison authorities, I would say the damages are de minimis and would be denied." Counsel for appellant responded, "May I request that at least his seven copies be returned or that he be credited with a dollar five cents." The court then ruled, "They can be returned. There is no reason why they shouldn't. If they still have the newspapers, give them to him. If they haven't, the damages are de minimis" (Tr. 17).

Nothing further was said on the subject.

On this record, any claim for damages other than for the value of the newspapers was waived, and the claim for the latter was, indeed, de minimis.

Affirmed.

* Honorable Paul C. Weick, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Jackson v. Ward
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • September 13, 1978
    ...in any penal institution in this or any other state. See, e. g., Northern v. Nelson, 315 F.Supp. 687 (N.D.Cal.1970), aff'd 448 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1971). Samuel Moreno, who was Director of Education for the Department of Correctional Services and who was also Chairman of the Departmental Me......
  • United States v. Kahane
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • May 7, 1975
    ...comparable opportunities for religious practices must be offered); Northern v. Nelson, 315 F.Supp. 687 (N.D.Cal.1970), aff'd, 448 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1971) (prison that provides Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish clergy must provide Muslim minister on similar contractual basis); Kauffman v. J......
  • Gray Panthers v. Schweiker, 79-1603
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit
    • March 18, 1981
    ...When monetary interests are at stake, the doctrine has been limited to matters involving a few dollars or less. See Northern v. Nelson, 448 F.2d 1266 (9th Cir. 1971) (claim for damages of $1.05 properly dismissed as de minimis ). Even in these inflationary times, the loss of sums of up to $......
  • Mickelson v. Cnty. of Ramsey
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 4, 2016
    ...595 F.3d 327 (6th Cir.2010) (holding that an individual's property interest in a $10 pool pass was de minimis ); Northern v. Nelson, 448 F.2d 1266, 1267 (9th Cir.1971) (finding a claim for damages of $1.05 was properly dismissed as de minimis ); cf. Schilb v. Kuebel, 404 U.S. 357, 365, 92 S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT