Northrop v. Marquam

Decision Date14 April 1888
Citation16 Or. 173,18 P. 449
PartiesNORTHROP et al. v. MARQUAM.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

June 8 1888

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from circuit court, Multnomah county.

Ejectment by William N. Northrop, Ella Middleton, and Courtland J Northrop against P.A. Marquam. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant.

Moreland & Masters and J.K. Kelly, for appellants.

Mitchell Dement & Wilcox, for respondent.

STRAHAN J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover an undivided one-fourth of certain real property situated in Multnomah county. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and the following facts and conclusions of law were found by the court:

"(1) That Henry C. Northrop, being an inhabitant of Multnomah county, Or., died in said county on the 27th day of June 1870, seized and possessed, at the time of his death, of the undivided half of the whole tract of land described in the complaint herein, and J.C. Van Renssalaer was seized and possessed of the other undivided half.

"(2) That said Henry C. Northrop left surviving him his lawful wife, Mattie V.I. Northrop, and the following-named living children, to-wit, William N. Northrop, Sarah Ella Northrop now called in the complaint Ella Middleton, and Courtland J. Northrop; and there was born of his said wife, Mattie V.I., after his death, a lawful child of said Henry C. Northrop, on the 18th day of February, 1871, which child was named Hettie Northrop, and died on April 15, 1873.

"(3) That the sole heirs at law of said Hettie Northrop, deceased, were her mother, said Mattie V.I., and her brothers and sisters named in finding No. 2 above; and said Mattie V.I. died intestate on the 14th day of January, 1874, leaving surviving her the three children above named, to-wit, William and Courtland J. Northrop and Ella Middleton, (then Ella Northrop,) who are the sole heirs at law of Mattie V.I., as well as of said Hettie.

"(4) That on the 11th day of June, 1870, said Henry C. Northrop made his last will and testament, of which a copy (omitting formal parts) reads as follows: 'First. I hereby constitute and appoint my beloved wife, Martha V.I. Northrop, to be executrix, and my beloved brother-in-law, Leander Quivey, to be my sole executor, of this, my last will and testament, directing them to pay all of my just debts and funeral expenses out of my estate. Second. I hereby give, devise, and bequeath unto my said beloved wife, Martha V.I. Northrop, lot No. (1) one, in block No. two hundred and three, (203,) in the city of Portland, aforesaid, the same being the homestead which we now occupy, and also all my goods, furniture, clothing, silver-ware, pictures, and jewelry, to be received and held by her as her own property in her own right forever. Third. It is my will and I do hereby direct, authorize, and empower my said beloved executrix and executor to sell at private or public sale, at such time or times and at such prices as they shall deem expedient, all the rest and residue of my real estate, or such part thereof as they may deem advisable, and the avails thereof to place at interest or reinvest, and the rents, issues, and profits thereof apply to the support of my said beloved wife, and the support and education of my said beloved children, hereinafter named, until they become twenty-one years of age. Fourth. All my property, except such portion thereof as is hereinbefore given, devised, or bequeathed to my said beloved wife, or the avails thereof in case of sale as aforesaid, and all the rents, issues, and profits thereof, except such as may be consumed in the support of my said beloved wife, and in the support and education of my beloved children, hereinafter named, I hereby give, devise, and bequeath unto my said beloved wife, and to my beloved children, Sarah Ella Northrop, William N. Northrop, and Courtland J. Northrop, share and share alike; the shares of my beloved children to be paid over to them by my said executrix and executor as such children shall become twenty-one years of age.' Which said will was duly admitted to probate in the county court of Multnomah county.

"(5) On the _______ day of July, 1870, the executors of said last will filed in the said county court a petition for an order to sell the property of said Henry C. Northrop, deceased, of which a copy reads as follows:

" 'The undersigned, executrix and executor of the last will and testament of Henry C. Northrop, deceased, respectfully represents unto this honorable court that said deceased, by his last will and testament, intended to and did provide for the support of his widow, and the support and education of his children, from the revenue of the avails of his real estate not devised, as by reference to his last will and testament, admitted to probate and on file in this court, will fully and at large appear; that there is no personal property of the estate of said deceased, exempt from execution, not bequeathed by said last will and testament, to be set apart for the support of the widow and children of said deceased; and that all of the property of said estate not so bequeathed is insufficient to pay the debts and testamentary expenses of said estate, although the estate of said deceased is sufficient, as we believe, after the payment of all debts and liabilities, to afford a reasonable support to such widow and children. Wherefore, and because the widow and children of said deceased are and will be without the means of support except from the the sale of such real estate, the undersigned pray that the personal property of the estate of said deceased be sold by said executrix and executor, at public or private sale, in their discretion, and the proceeds thereof be applied towards the settlement of said estate; and also that the following described real estate be also sold, by such executrix and executor, agreeable to the statute in such case made and provided, and the proceeds be reinvested or placed at interest, and the rents, issues, and profits, and increase be applied to the support of the widow, and the support and education of the children, of said deceased. Said real estate of said deceased not devised, and herein placed to be sold, is described as follows, to-wit: The undivided half of lot number five, in block number one hundred and twelve, in the city of Portland, in the county of Multnomah, in the state of Oregon. Also the undivided half of three hundred and twenty acres, more or less, of land, situate in Marion county, in the state of Oregon, in township six south, of range two west, deeded by Anson Mohart and wife to Henry C. Northrop and J.C. Van Renssalaer, and covered by notification No. 395. And also the undivided half of all that part of the donation land claim of Thomas Stephens, in the county of Multnomah, in said state, beginning at the south-east corner of said land claim, and running thence west eighty chains; thence north, at right angles with said last-mentioned line, thirty-six chains and twenty-five links; thence east, parallel with said first-mentioned line, seventy-six chains and twenty-five links, to the south bank of the Willamette river; and thence south, following the meanderings of said river, to the place of beginning,--containing 271 1/2 acres, less the amount thereof heretofore sold by deceased and J.C. Van Renssalaer, amounting to about ten acres, more or less. And also the west half of the north-east quarter, and the east half of the north-west quarter, of section twenty-eight, in township one south, of range one east, in the Willamette land-district, in said state, containing 160 acres of land. The undersigned, Mattie V.I. Northrop, aged twenty-eight years, is one of the legatees and heirs of said deceased; and Sarah E., aged eight years, William N., aged six years, and Courtland J. Northrop, aged two years, are the children and sole remaining heirs and legators of said deceased; and all reside in the city of Portland, in said county of Multnomah. All of which is respectfully submitted. MARTHA VI. NORTHROP, Executrix. LEANDER QUIVEY, Executor.

" 'State of Oregon, Multnomah County--ss.: I, Leander Quivey, one of the petitioners in the foregoing petition, being duly sworn, say that I verily believe that the foregoing petition, by me subscribed, and the matters and things therein contained, are true. Subscribed and sworn to this 18th day of July, A.D.1870. C.W. PARRISH, Clerk. By JAMES W. DAVIS, Deputy.'

"(6) On which petition said county court, on the 1st day of August, 1870, made an order in words and figures following to-wit: 'In the Matter of the Estate of Henry C. Northrop, Deceased. Now, on this day, based upon the application of the executrix and executor of the last will and testament of Henry C. Northrop, deceased, heretofore filed in this court, it appearing to the court that Martha V.I. Northrop, widow, Sarah E., William N., and Courtland J. Northrop, children, of said deceased, have been duly served with citation more than ten days before the first day of this term of this court, and William P. Doland, heretofore appointed guardian ad litem for each of said children, having appeared, and being satisfied that the sale prayed for in said application is authorized by the last will and testament of said deceased, and that no reason exists why the prayer of said petitioners should not be granted, and the court having duly considered said premises, and being satisfied that said petition, and the matters and things therein contained, are true, and that the prayer of said petition ought to be granted, it is therefore hereby ordered by the court that Martha V.I. Northrop, executrix, and Leander Quivey, executor, of the last will and testament of Henry C. Northrop, deceased, be, and they are hereby,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Hodgkiss v. Consolidated
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • 31 Marzo 1937
    ...to be ousted or disseized, and of laches on his part, should he, under such circumstances, fail to assert his rights.’ Northrop v. Marquam, 16 Or. 173, 18 P. 449, 459; and see Weshgyl v. Schick, 113 Mich. 22, 71 N.W. 323;Baily v. Trammell, 27 Tex. [317] 328; 38 Cyc. 23. The proof in this ca......
  • Wren v. Dixon
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 15 Diciembre 1916
    ...our statute they had the right to commence this action at any time within two years after they were by law chargeable with notice. Northrop v. Marquam, supra. doctrine that statutes of limitation usually except infants from their operation has received eminent sanction. 1 R. C. L. 759. The ......
  • Smith v. Steen
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • 8 Julio 1915
    ...Wash. 491, 48 Pac. 264; Morrison v. Morrison, 25 Wash. 467, 65 Pac. 779; Gerrish v. Gerrish, 8 Or. 351, 34 Am. Rep. 585; Northrop v. Marquam, 16 Or. 173, 18 Pac. 449; Worley v. Taylor, 21 Or. 589, 28 Pac. 903, 28 Am. St. Rep. 771. In Bower v. Bower, 5 Wash. 225, 31 Pac. 598, where the court......
  • Boag v. Chief of Police, City of Portland, 80-3465
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 18 Febrero 1982
    ...applicable statute of limitations or (2) within one year of the date of termination of disability, whichever is later. Northrop v. Marquam, 16 Or. 173, 18 P. 449 (1888). See Hamm v. McKenny, 73 Or. 347, 144 P. 435 (1914); Note, 8 Or.L.Rev. 203, 205 (1979). Cf. Williams v. Coughlan, 253 F.2d......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT